11–20 of 36 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The right thing would've been to not train the model on data they do not own, or that they do not have permission to use.
Be careful saying that kind of stuff here. People get really mad when you tell them their new toys aren't ethical.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Leaking original data would expose the company to direct copyright violation lawsuits. Changing T&S is simplest way to stave the legal risk exposure, buying time to implement technical remedies. As ridiculous as it may seem, they're doing the right thing.
The right thing would've been to not train the model on data they do not own, or that they do not have permission to use.
[0] Heck, they could even unite and found an LLM startup themselves training the models legally and making it available for users at various tiers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Be careful saying that kind of stuff here. People get really mad when you tell them their new toys aren't ethical.
I made it my mission to get the lot of them mad. There are plenty of legitimate ai companies out there but YC seems fond of those unethical, which explains the infusion of ip stealing startups on here and their simps.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree. It’s not the model outputting this message. It is a hard coded checked by open ai. It seems to very clearly be openai responding to the specific attack used by deepmind as explained by the article. It is a TOS violation. It’s not a big one. But the weakness of the model is the story here.
At this point there are so many checks and rules applied to ChatGPT one wonders just how much performance is being sacrificed. Is it totally miniscule? Could it be significant?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree. It’s not the model outputting this message. It is a hard coded checked by open ai. It seems to very clearly be openai responding to the specific attack used by deepmind as explained by the article. It is a TOS violation. It’s not a big one. But the weakness of the model is the story here.
At this point there are so many checks and rules applied to ChatGPT one wonders just how much performance is being sacrificed. Is it totally miniscule? Could it be significant?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At this point there are so many checks and rules applied to ChatGPT one wonders just how much performance is being sacrificed. Is it totally miniscule? Could it be significant?
Is it really artificial intelligence when there are so many human limits and rules placed on it?
Lol, what a weak defense. Fine, ban your competitors when they pay $20 per peek at your training data
I think it's more an attempt to ban the people who OpenAI stole data from when they pay $20 to gather evidence about what data was stolen.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Leaking original data would expose the company to direct copyright violation lawsuits. Changing T&S is simplest way to stave the legal risk exposure, buying time to implement technical remedies. As ridiculous as it may seem, they're doing the right thing.
The right thing would've been to not train the model on data they do not own, or that they do not have permission to use.
Lol, what a weak defense. Fine, ban your competitors when they pay $20 per peek at your training data
> Fine, ban your competitors when they pay $20 per peek at your training data I think it's more an attempt to ban the people who OpenAI stole data from when they pay $20 to gather evidence about what data was stolen.