11–20 of 24 posts
Everyone is trying really hard to find an actual use for LLM in mainstream Applications. So far little progress has been made
It will take care of hypsters and their proven 'raise gobs of cheap cash on hype and capture market as fast as possible to hide half baked product' strategy.
Everyone is trying really hard to find an actual use for LLM in mainstream Applications. So far little progress has been made
open world video games with lots of npcs
Everyone is trying really hard to find an actual use for LLM in mainstream Applications. So far little progress has been made
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hard disagree. ChatGPT is already useful for work. I regularly see it used for legal and technical questions.
A trick I do with ChatGPT 3 is type in student questions. One thing it is generally bad at is recognising bad questions. Someone who knew the frameworks would probe a little and figure out that the student was looking up a dead end. I think it’s great, and sometimes good enough for me to use as the basis of my answers.
Everyone is trying really hard to find an actual use for LLM in mainstream Applications. So far little progress has been made
Thank god that interest rates are no longer zero, which propped up all kinds of over hyped, half baked crap in the last 20-30 years. It will take care of hypsters and their proven 'raise gobs of cheap cash on hype and capture market as fast as possible to hide half baked product' strategy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A trick I do with ChatGPT 3 is type in student questions. One thing it is generally bad at is recognising bad questions. Someone who knew the frameworks would probe a little and figure out that the student was looking up a dead end. I think it’s great, and sometimes good enough for me to use as the basis of my answers.
I feel like anyone who claims chatgpt is helping them work is just telling on themselves as trying to do things out of their depth and producing output they don't understand well enough to vet.
I have plenty of criticism for chatGPT. It attempts to fake nuance by creating shallow syntheses of conflicting info. It doesn’t understand anything it talks about systemically. It has no insight into the user.
But it can regurgitate a list that you can use to structure your answer to a student’s question. It’s interesting to me because people do want me to believe it’s coming for my job. It’s a way off yet.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
open world video games with lots of npcs
Do people really want that? I feel like what often makes a game good is a tight experience, not added bloat.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like anyone who claims chatgpt is helping them work is just telling on themselves as trying to do things out of their depth and producing output they don't understand well enough to vet.
ChatGPT sets a baseline. If my answer isn’t better than ChatGPT there would be no point in employing me. But students use it all the time. They use it to cheat. They use it to brainstorm. I have plenty of criticism for chatGPT. It attempts to fake nuance by creating shallow syntheses of conflicting info. It doesn’t understand anything it talks about systemically. It has no insight into the user. But it can regurgitat…