Snaps. Why? Please Stop
11–20 of 115 posts
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#12You’re a company and your software actually runs on Linux. You want to reach as many people as possible. So you make a .deb for Ubuntu. Or you go with a package manager that is cross-distro. That’s why.
So flatpak?
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#13You’re a company and your software actually runs on Linux. You want to reach as many people as possible. So you make a .deb for Ubuntu. Or you go with a package manager that is cross-distro. That’s why.
> Or you go with a package manager that is cross-distro. > That’s why. So flatpak?
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#14Why? Because of Dependency Hell. Apt sometimes even tries to solve "circular dependencies". Ridiculous.
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#15My concern is that a lot of laptops come with soldered in, non replaceable hard drives and all these sandboxed programs take up a lot of space. So if you buy cheap laptop with 256GB storage and start installing snap/flatpak/appimage eventually you’ll run out of disk storage and won’t be able to upgrade it (storage, that is). And the only solution is to buy upgradable laptop or a laptop with a lot of storage upfront.…
This model has been used on phones and Macs for ages, and for most people it’s not an issue. Photos, videos, and game assets are taking up all the space.
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#16He knows the answer, he just doesn't like it for stupid ideological reasons.
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#17Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#18You’re a company and your software actually runs on Linux. You want to reach as many people as possible. So you make a .deb for Ubuntu. Or you go with a package manager that is cross-distro. That’s why.
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Or you go with a package manager that is cross-distro. > That’s why. So flatpak?
Well, flatpack still doesn't address the non-gui app/utility part of the equation.
Re: Snaps. Why? Please Stop
#20Why? Because of Dependency Hell. Apt sometimes even tries to solve "circular dependencies". Ridiculous.
You're possibly using it wrong.