> His main interest, as he wrote in his best-selling autobiography-cum–self-help book, Principles: Life and Work, is to lead others toward “meaningful lives” and “meaningful relationships.” … > Staffers were given iPads and directed to rank one another on a one-to-ten scale on their performance dozens of times per day in categories derived from Dalio’s Principles … > The goal of all the data, Dalio would say, was to…
'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
11–20 of 179 posts
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#12Is it all a front or a Madoff situation?
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#13> His main interest, as he wrote in his best-selling autobiography-cum–self-help book, Principles: Life and Work, is to lead others toward “meaningful lives” and “meaningful relationships.” … > Staffers were given iPads and directed to rank one another on a one-to-ten scale on their performance dozens of times per day in categories derived from Dalio’s Principles … > The goal of all the data, Dalio would say, was to…
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#14"Scientology, but for hedge funds!"
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#15Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#16[flagged]
I have no idea why the article doesn't lead with this, but it's adapted from a book:
> Dalio declined to be interviewed for the book from which this article is adapted.
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#17Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#18The way they sold it sounded a bit culty to me, and the potential for abusive behaviour seemed high. Didn't make me want to work for them.
Re: 'Ray, this is a religion': How Bridgewater lost two top hires
#19This may have been just a stupid delusion by Dalio but some day one of these sociopaths is gonna get their hands on the wrong AI model and end us all. The necessary precondition of private individuals side stepping democratic control via their unchecked powerful organizations is already established. Gotta hope for the whistleblowers...
I think you're seeing it wrong. When CEOs no longer need scientists and engineers, when they can speak their will into existence directly, they will immediately destroy themselves . This rating system, had the CEO gotten it's say, would not have made Bridgewater thrive. That stupid ideas are often impossible to accomplish is a huge barrier to stupid leadership screwing themselves sideways. Anyways, thats the optimist…
Chances are a CEO type will be the first to get their hands on AGI or something close enough.