11–20 of 462 posts
Sounds like a low key way to force employees back into the office.
How so?
This will force them to enforce it, with the threat of having to pay a big bill if any employee claims to be working from home.
I like the idea, but not the implementation. I think it should be done as a tax credit for the employee or the company instead. Doing so creates positive incentives for companies to hire remote workers in California. Requiring the company to pay up by force of law disincentivizes companies from hiring remote workers in California. I also think that it would be more equitable since an employee’s home office setup belo…
I like the idea, but not the implementation. I think it should be done as a tax credit for the employee or the company instead. Doing so creates positive incentives for companies to hire remote workers in California. Requiring the company to pay up by force of law disincentivizes companies from hiring remote workers in California. I also think that it would be more equitable since an employee’s home office setup belo…
Sounds like a low key way to force employees back into the office.
How so?
If a company already has an office near you they may just say you need to come into the office, they will not pay for your internet and electric bill.
If you drive into the office they don't have to pay for your car, insurance, registration, gas, etc.
I think CA had good intentions here, but I think it's going to give employers one less reason to hire remote employees in CA.
This would accelerate back to office a bit. Remote workers seemed to have barked up the wrong tree this time
Sounds like a low key way to force employees back into the office.
How so?
Asking for employers to pay more for remote workers than they do for in-office employees will either result in fewer remote jobs or remote jobs paying lower salary (which will lead to lower demand for remote jobs).