Live data from Hacker News

Signal commit Username Integration Test

github.com

11–20 of 76 posts

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#11
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Signal at the moment requires a phone number. People don't like that e.g. for privacy reasons. Signal said they'll eventually support usernames, this is a signal that there's progress.

Signal will still require a phone number for registration. You will be able to hide your phone number and use a username instead.

[dead]

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#12
post #9
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Signal isn’t a social network… it’s a messaging app.

I mean, I dont agree with the person you are replying to, but signal absolutely is a social network. Its a network you use to communicate socially. You can argue its not social media , but I think the stories feature definitely puts it on the social media spectrum to some degree.

Does anyone actually use the stories feature?

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#13
post #12
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, I dont agree with the person you are replying to, but signal absolutely is a social network. Its a network you use to communicate socially. You can argue its not social media , but I think the stories feature definitely puts it on the social media spectrum to some degree.

Does anyone actually use the stories feature?

I turned it off as soon as it was debuted.

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#14

Signal is finally copying what Telegram has implemented since long ago? Do people in the West simply do not care about hiding their number (judging by WhatsApp and Signal)?

The mobile number requirement was always a feature of signal.

The friction is slight for users, but higher for scammers that might go through thousands of accounts. Telegram is too easy to sign up, so it's mostly scams.

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#15
post #12
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, I dont agree with the person you are replying to, but signal absolutely is a social network. Its a network you use to communicate socially. You can argue its not social media , but I think the stories feature definitely puts it on the social media spectrum to some degree.

Does anyone actually use the stories feature?

My friends on Signal do, but I have no idea how widespread it is across their whole userbase. It's not as in-your-face as Instagram, which is actually kind of nice, but like it's being said - signal is social media. you can choose to not use that feature but that's on you. To look at you and your friend group and extrapolate from there is not science, or data driven. the plural of anecdote is not data.

It's like saying no one uses Facebook or Google anymore. That's true for certain bubbles, and it's hard to know when you're in one, but, say least for those two, it's not too hard to look outside your bubble.

Now the cryptocurrency integration, that one I do wonder about. (Since my friend group doesn't use it and I'm extrapolating :) ).

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#16
post #5
post #4

What are we looking at here?

Signal at the moment requires a phone number. People don't like that e.g. for privacy reasons. Signal said they'll eventually support usernames, this is a signal that there's progress.

I parsed that title so wrong, I thought Username Integration Test was a fault they just commited and were caught red handed.

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#17
post #5
post #4

What are we looking at here?

Signal at the moment requires a phone number. People don't like that e.g. for privacy reasons. Signal said they'll eventually support usernames, this is a signal that there's progress.

Based on that integration test a phone number is still required.

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#18

Signal is finally copying what Telegram has implemented since long ago? Do people in the West simply do not care about hiding their number (judging by WhatsApp and Signal)?

Never really understood the privacy argument for hiding (or disconnecting) your phone number in a User-User "texting" type application. I suppose if Signal were linking my identity across a bunch of platforms I'd be worried, but their privacy policy is pretty aggressive so I'm not really worried about that. Indeed the additional friction for scammers is a benefit to me. Telegram is a morass of dodgy group chats and spam, Signal is miles better for the things I value in a messaging service (encrypted texting and group chatting with people I already know in the real world).

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#19
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Signal at the moment requires a phone number. People don't like that e.g. for privacy reasons. Signal said they'll eventually support usernames, this is a signal that there's progress.

Signal will still require a phone number for registration. You will be able to hide your phone number and use a username instead.

I hope I can finally put signal on my second phone with the same account.

Re: Signal commit Username Integration Test

#20

Signal is finally copying what Telegram has implemented since long ago? Do people in the West simply do not care about hiding their number (judging by WhatsApp and Signal)?

Bringing up Telegram in this context makes it quite funny, since Telegram users seem not to care about the safety of the contents of their chats at all in this shady black box.

Phone numbers are a quite ridiculously small problem compared to that.

Post reply on HN