Live data from Hacker News

Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

gizmodo.com

11–20 of 50 posts

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#11
post #8

in a 'perfect' future: we would cut off our own limbs to get the nimble-tron 5000 with magnetic finger extensions and predictive AI that totally doesn't strangle anyone even a little. I joke... but I unironically can't wait for replacement limb tech to be that desirable. Imagine the upgrades people would get...

The vision and ideas from the game Deus Ex are waiting to happen.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#13

This is pretty amazing, but I wonder--how does the body adapt to having a piece of hardware that extends through the skin? Does the body not see this as an open wound? It seems like being permanently impaled with a metal pole.

Not a doctor, but semipermanent ports are common. I imagine with the right coatings and materials, we know how to manage natural rejection.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#14

This is pretty amazing, but I wonder--how does the body adapt to having a piece of hardware that extends through the skin? Does the body not see this as an open wound? It seems like being permanently impaled with a metal pole.

Would probably assume some level of immunosuppressants might be necessary.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#15
post #6

I've seen some amazing prosthetics on the internet, I've been seeing them for decades, but none of them get wide use. They're either all "experimental" or so insanely expensive that nobody can get them. These kinds of articles can make us feel good about science and hopeful about our future, but the reality is that the people who need these things are basically never going to have one or anything close to one.

You’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t.

Look how much hatred there is for Neuralink. A company actually trying to productize and bring to market a device that will allow quadriplegic people to move and walk again, which could restore life for so many people who need help and have no other options.

So if you do try to bring it to market you’re pilloried by the press and everyone online and if you don’t it’s sad because it seems like there’s nobody trying to make the technology accessible.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#16
post #8

in a 'perfect' future: we would cut off our own limbs to get the nimble-tron 5000 with magnetic finger extensions and predictive AI that totally doesn't strangle anyone even a little. I joke... but I unironically can't wait for replacement limb tech to be that desirable. Imagine the upgrades people would get...

This is not an "upgrade". A replacement is a concession, a patch, a crutch, a mere instrument. It doesn't matter if the crutch can crack open Brazil nuts or turn your TV on or allow you to fetch the keys that fell behind the fridge. Metaphysically, it is always an inferior, if sophisticated, instrument. Ridding yourself of perfectly good limbs to replace them with an instrument is not only a "downgrade", but gravely and grotesquely immoral.

You can blame the incoherent travesty that is mechanistic metaphysics for the strange notion it is otherwise.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#17
post #6

I've seen some amazing prosthetics on the internet, I've been seeing them for decades, but none of them get wide use. They're either all "experimental" or so insanely expensive that nobody can get them. These kinds of articles can make us feel good about science and hopeful about our future, but the reality is that the people who need these things are basically never going to have one or anything close to one.

Very rarely does any technology start off cheap enough to be mass-produced. If you don't build prototypes then expensive bespoke initial models you'll often never get to the "half of all who need it can afford it" let alone "90%+ can afford it".

If you don't like that then the government will need to step up with public funds.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#18
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure why you're downvoted here - in the video they show at least one non-hand attachment, a computer terminal which lets her control a virtual hand for training purposes. Two wires run from her implants to the terminal.

People probably thought that they had a particular kind of attachment in mind. One that can't be mentioned in polite society.

Or people thought asking if a prosthetic, which is an attachment, came with an attachment to be a pointless question

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#19
post #8

in a 'perfect' future: we would cut off our own limbs to get the nimble-tron 5000 with magnetic finger extensions and predictive AI that totally doesn't strangle anyone even a little. I joke... but I unironically can't wait for replacement limb tech to be that desirable. Imagine the upgrades people would get...

The technological singularity actually occurs when the prosthetic hand gives a hand jibber unrecognizable from a real one.

Re: Woman's experimental bionic hand passes major test

#20

This is pretty amazing, but I wonder--how does the body adapt to having a piece of hardware that extends through the skin? Does the body not see this as an open wound? It seems like being permanently impaled with a metal pole.

Like an earring? The skin typically forms a fistula-like sheath around the metal.
Post reply on HN