[dead]
Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Here
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Here
#12My starting point for a human friendly AGI benchmark is Commander Data from the Starship Enterprise. On a more thoughtful note perhaps, I believe AGI would have to emulate the human capability of changing the attentional conductor focus (see cognitive architecture chart) based on sensors that bring the attentional element and its aperture onto emergent elements or signals. This would then have to pull the appropriate…
Who is right? Google: LLMs are already AGI
Or me: LLMs are just useful for experts:
https://open.substack.com/pub/rakkhi/p/economics-of-large-la...
Re: Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Here
#13My starting point for a human friendly AGI benchmark is Commander Data from the Starship Enterprise. On a more thoughtful note perhaps, I believe AGI would have to emulate the human capability of changing the attentional conductor focus (see cognitive architecture chart) based on sensors that bring the attentional element and its aperture onto emergent elements or signals. This would then have to pull the appropriate…
Who is right? Google: LLMs are already AGI Or me: LLMs are just useful for experts: https://open.substack.com/pub/rakkhi/p/economics-of-large-la...
The fine article addresses most of this. In their terms, you are complaining that this ENIAC of AGI is not performing like a CAD workstation or something. Of course it isn't. The question is not how performant it is, but whether it is AGI - no matter how insufficient for our ideal Jetsonian needs.
Your only argument for it not being AGI is "clearly". You'll need to expand on that part.
Re: Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Here
#14This article is by Peter Norvig, former director of research at Google, and coauthor of the most popular textbook on AI. Regardless of whether you agree, this is a pretty powerful “mainstream” statement.