Live data from Hacker News

2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

nobelprize.org

11–20 of 135 posts

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#12
post #7

[flagged]

[flagged]

Granted, the merit of some of the awards is questionable, but I think e.g.: Nash's work on game theory or Kahneman/Tvservky's on the pyschology of judgment definitely fall under the umbrella of "science".

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#13
post #4

> Goldin showed that female participation in the labour market did not have an upward trend over this entire period, but instead forms a U-shaped curve. The participation of married women decreased with the transition from an agrarian to an industrial society in the early nineteenth century, but then started to increase with the growth of the service sector in the early twentieth century. Goldin explained this patter…

[flagged]

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#15
> During the twentieth century, women’s education levels continuously increased, and in most high-income countries they are now substantially higher than for men.

> However, Goldin has shown that the bulk of this earnings difference is now between [sic] and women in the same occupation, and that it largely arises with the birth of the first child.

Interesting situation developing if the main effort is in educating women who then leave the workforce. I assume one of these is going to have to give - presumably who takes primary caregiver responsbilities.

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#16
post #13
post #4

> Goldin showed that female participation in the labour market did not have an upward trend over this entire period, but instead forms a U-shaped curve. The participation of married women decreased with the transition from an agrarian to an industrial society in the early nineteenth century, but then started to increase with the growth of the service sector in the early twentieth century. Goldin explained this patter…

[flagged]

Hmm yeah that last sentence resonates.

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#19
post #4

> Goldin showed that female participation in the labour market did not have an upward trend over this entire period, but instead forms a U-shaped curve. The participation of married women decreased with the transition from an agrarian to an industrial society in the early nineteenth century, but then started to increase with the growth of the service sector in the early twentieth century. Goldin explained this patter…

Somebody should superimpose the U-curve with the fertility rate graph. It might be that women employment picked up again when women gave up on having children/families. If you live in a 1st world country and you're too poor to afford to have a family (and by this I mean to be able to raise children with a certain standard of living) you might as well have a career... just to have some semblance of meaning in life.

Re: 2023 Nobel Prize in economics awarded to Claudia Goldin

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Granted, the merit of some of the awards is questionable, but I think e.g.: Nash's work on game theory or Kahneman/Tvservky's on the pyschology of judgment definitely fall under the umbrella of "science".

There are plenty of awards granted for great work in computer science, electrical engineering, or any number of other fields.

It doesn't make them Nobel prizes.

At least the ACM never attempted to hang on the coattails of the the Nobel Prize by naming the Turing award for Alfred Nobel.

Post reply on HN