But they can already support like one and a half full time developers. Krita future looks bright.
Krita fund has no corporate support
11–20 of 223 posts
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#12I want someone to build this: SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) are slowly becoming ubiquitus around the world due to regulation. I want to be able to aggregate all SBOMs within my company, have a small tool that scans my machine and creates a SBOM for all Open Source tools I use (e.g. Firefox, VLC etc.), uploads that to my corporate registry. This data is then submitted to a donation aggregator which analyzes those…
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#13That's just sad. Open Source support really needs to be normalized in corporate environment. Now it's more of an exception than the rule.
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#14Curious. After all I've heard about Krita in the last few years one would think at least a couple of larger studios would use it to some extent.
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#15But they can already support like one and a half full time developers. Krita future looks bright.
Are they really paying a full time developer only 3000 €/month?
US dev salaries have been completely skewed by stupid levels of VC money. European ones not so much.
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#16That said, it's still a shame! Seems like there would be someone out there with similar interests. I hope this post, or whatever else, helps evangelize this as a problem!
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#17I want someone to build this: SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) are slowly becoming ubiquitus around the world due to regulation. I want to be able to aggregate all SBOMs within my company, have a small tool that scans my machine and creates a SBOM for all Open Source tools I use (e.g. Firefox, VLC etc.), uploads that to my corporate registry. This data is then submitted to a donation aggregator which analyzes those…
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#18Don't get me wrong, I love Krita. I used it for years and I wrote ~30+ bug reports. It's a positive thing -- I won't bother reporting bugs to Adobe cause I know they don't care, unlike Krita devs.
However every time I need to collaborate with someone else, they use Photoshop. They use .psd like it's an interchangeable format[1]. Out of 10+ artists I've only seen one who doesn't use PS, and it's not Krita.
[1]: I know Krita can read and write .psd.
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#19I want someone to build this: SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) are slowly becoming ubiquitus around the world due to regulation. I want to be able to aggregate all SBOMs within my company, have a small tool that scans my machine and creates a SBOM for all Open Source tools I use (e.g. Firefox, VLC etc.), uploads that to my corporate registry. This data is then submitted to a donation aggregator which analyzes those…
Re: Krita fund has no corporate support
#20That's just sad. Open Source support really needs to be normalized in corporate environment. Now it's more of an exception than the rule.
When corporate support rolls in, project tend to turn sour. Demand from the corporate entities proceed to dominate rather than voices from individual donations. Its a double edged sword.