This content feels like it was AI generated then edited by a human.
A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#12The title, the preamble, and the content of this article feel so click baity and unnecessarily elaborated.
I'm new to blogging about marketing so just doing my best, I usually write about technical topics. Happy to hear what I can improve for my next post, if you have advice.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#13This content feels like it was AI generated then edited by a human.
Haha it was actually written by a human (me) but I did use AI to proofread (English is not my first language). So the other way around...
For context, phrases like "We'll take a look at" are what typically lead me to lean towards AI being part of the mix. There are other things about the article that did that too but they may be related to you working in a non-native language.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#14About the post content: I found the analysis itself a bit shallow, but I really appreciate this new perspective on doing review-first analysis without even trying the app first, since it's something I've never considered
Thanks for sharing!
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#15The title, the preamble, and the content of this article feel so click baity and unnecessarily elaborated.
It feels like it was written by AI. Everything makes sense grammatically, but somehow it says very little in many words. Or maybe I've just become too paranoid.
I'll try to make my next post more concise.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#16The post reads fine, I don't understand why others think it's AI generated. About the post content: I found the analysis itself a bit shallow, but I really appreciate this new perspective on doing review-first analysis without even trying the app first, since it's something I've never considered Thanks for sharing!
I'm new to writing about marketing, so I hope to improve as I go and offer better insight with more practice.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#17The title, the preamble, and the content of this article feel so click baity and unnecessarily elaborated.
I'm new to blogging about marketing so just doing my best, I usually write about technical topics. Happy to hear what I can improve for my next post, if you have advice.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm new to blogging about marketing so just doing my best, I usually write about technical topics. Happy to hear what I can improve for my next post, if you have advice.
It's ' -- the reviews show how' in the title instead of summarising how or even just not saying that that does it for me, I won't click something like that.
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#19This content feels like it was AI generated then edited by a human.
Haha it was actually written by a human (me) but I did use AI to proofread (English is not my first language). So the other way around...
So perhaps more editing was needed, to distill the message.
If English is not your first language then it’s pretty damn good in that context :)
Re: A phone cleaning app makes $2M/mo on the App Store – The reviews show how
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
This user also posted the same article on the same website but with a different title, not 24h before this one.
I thought it's allowed to try to post the same article more than once no?