And they said Rails was a Ghetto…
Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
#12I think some of the vitriol hurled was over the top, especially given that folks can just fork the project and move on -- isn't that the whole point of OSS? If it were a closed source product it wouldn't have even necessitated much of an announcement. Disregarding the specifics of who worked on this, I think this sort of reaction can only be discouraging to OSS maintainers as a whole (much as I agree that the change…
My first reaction to this is that why don't we just do OpenTF again and splinter away from Turbo, just boycott Turbo from then on.
Re: Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
#13Standard behaviour of a Youtube influencer.
Who? This is the first I've heard of a youtuber sticking his nose in this.
Re: Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
#14I agree with him. The typescript community is very unprofessional for going around spamming repos because some project they don't use or contribute too has removed their favorite language from the project. Believe it or not, but JS vs TS really comes down to personal preference. Turbo is for client side JS and it used in a Ruby framework. Why is it so surprising that Ruby programmers want their other code built in a…
It's also worth noting that Turbo users don't interact with it via JS, it's whole purpose is to create interactive web applications without JS. You apply data attributes to HTML elements and the framework manipulates the DOM based on server responses.
A person using Turbo and upgrading to this version wouldn't notice a difference.
Re: Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
#15Re: Open source hooliganism and the TypeScript meltdown
#16Standard behaviour of a Youtube influencer.
Standard behavior of a narcissist.