Makes me miss Terry a little bit :/
Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#12Isn't the fib function as given heretical? Is it missing an oath, or is that the point?
It ends with:
swear result >= 0
return resultRe: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#13I laughed. Hard.
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#14Replace deleted with passed to ChatGPT and you'll have VCs lining up.
Is this like God working through you to change your ways and become righteous?
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#15Let's be clear, we all know that Virgil doesn't go far enough because PEBCAK
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#16By fire shall it be cleansed, by the blade shall it be redeemed,
no evil shall taint this blessed land!
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#17Talk about executable…
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#18[dead]
Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#19Re: Vigil, the eternal morally vigilant programming language
#20> It goes without saying that any function that throws an exception which isn't caught is wrong and must be punished.
Surely the failure is in the lack of handling, not in the throwing of the exception itself? I suppose the lack of checked exceptions in Python makes it impossible to blame the handler because there is no way to indicate what exceptions may be thrown.