Live data from Hacker News

YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

torrentfreak.com

11–20 of 256 posts

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#11
post #3

As noted in the article, the project still has a page on github: http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/ I've moved on to https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp anyways. But this is still an infuriating move. youtube-dl wasn't doing anything infringing on its site, was it?

yt-dlp is not youtube-dl

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#12
post #3

As noted in the article, the project still has a page on github: http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/ I've moved on to https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp anyways. But this is still an infuriating move. youtube-dl wasn't doing anything infringing on its site, was it?

yt-dlp is not youtube-dl

They said they moved on to yt-dlp

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#14

> While Uberspace didn't host the open source software, it was held responsible for the website linking to the software hosted on developer platform GitHub. Is Google, Bing, and DDG next?

>Is Google, Bing, and DDG next? You already can send a DMCA takedown for the links

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#15
post #2

It's laughable how symbolic and ultimately meaningless this is. GitHub has already proven themselves to be a good actor in this particular fight, so not only is the repo online, but we also have http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/ The Uberspace provider is appealing the decision as well. Even with the site down, this looks incredibly positive from where I sit. Rightsholders and litigators get stuffed, we always win…

Microsoft is the freedom fighter? That it is indeed laughable.

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#17

> While Uberspace didn't host the open source software, it was held responsible for the website linking to the software hosted on developer platform GitHub. Is Google, Bing, and DDG next?

They already target DNS resolvers.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36878867

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#18
post #7

Somewhat relatedly: I've been using Uberspace for years now to host some personal stuff (e.g. my Nextcloud instance). It's really cheap (you can start for as low as 5€/month), and I don't know any other shared hoster that allows so much flexibility in what you run on your account. The docs are also superb. I can only recommend it.

Thank you for mentioning this. Haven't heard of them before, but I really love the ethic they're advocating (and demonstrating in their pricing and payment options).

https://uberspace.de/en/

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#19
post #3

As noted in the article, the project still has a page on github: http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/ I've moved on to https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp anyways. But this is still an infuriating move. youtube-dl wasn't doing anything infringing on its site, was it?

Back then, I seem to recall there was an issue with an example given in the documentation.

Re: YouTube-Dl Site Goes Offline as Hosting Provider Enforces Court-Ordered Ban

#20
post #2

It's laughable how symbolic and ultimately meaningless this is. GitHub has already proven themselves to be a good actor in this particular fight, so not only is the repo online, but we also have http://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/ The Uberspace provider is appealing the decision as well. Even with the site down, this looks incredibly positive from where I sit. Rightsholders and litigators get stuffed, we always win…

i'd rephrase that, rightsholders should not get stuffed, but these are not rightsholders because their rights are not being infringed by the mere existance of youtube-dl
Post reply on HN