This just perpetuates the mispronunciation of 'WAT'. It is properly pronounced deadpan, to rhyme with 'but' (with no h-sound wutsoever).
WAT Driven Development
11–20 of 20 posts
Re: WAT Driven Development
#12Here is mine, to you, from me: http://soundcloud.com/ironballs/wat
Re: WAT Driven Development
#13Back when I used Visual Studio (1999), I did something similar using Robby the Robot (Warning), Daleks (for errors), the "You have the power" (Compilation successful) chick from RevCo's Gila Copter/Silence of the Lambs, and a Skinny Puppy rift (hitting a breakpoint)...good times!
Re: WAT Driven Development
#14The ESC key in vi is idempotent . It's not doing it wrong to hit it thousands of times. It's doing it wrong to have to model the state of your editor in your head. I have a similar habit of typing "git " in my terminal, and then getting distracted while I think through what I'm trying to do, and then just typing "git " again. Rather than punish myself, I just wrote a script called git-git. https://github.com/jes5199/…
[alias]
git = !gitRe: WAT Driven Development
#15All of these wats are wrong. Here is mine, to you, from me: http://soundcloud.com/ironballs/wat
Re: WAT Driven Development
#16This just perpetuates the mispronunciation of 'WAT'. It is properly pronounced deadpan, to rhyme with 'but' (with no h-sound wutsoever).
Re: WAT Driven Development
#17The ESC key in vi is idempotent . It's not doing it wrong to hit it thousands of times. It's doing it wrong to have to model the state of your editor in your head. I have a similar habit of typing "git " in my terminal, and then getting distracted while I think through what I'm trying to do, and then just typing "git " again. Rather than punish myself, I just wrote a script called git-git. https://github.com/jes5199/…
from the mouth of a vi user...
Re: WAT Driven Development
#18This just perpetuates the mispronunciation of 'WAT'. It is properly pronounced deadpan, to rhyme with 'but' (with no h-sound wutsoever).
What a silly thing to pretend to have any knowledge over. As if there is a consensus, or any authority by your part on the matter.
Re: WAT Driven Development
#19The ESC key in vi is idempotent . It's not doing it wrong to hit it thousands of times. It's doing it wrong to have to model the state of your editor in your head. I have a similar habit of typing "git " in my terminal, and then getting distracted while I think through what I'm trying to do, and then just typing "git " again. Rather than punish myself, I just wrote a script called git-git. https://github.com/jes5199/…
WAT? By that logic you don't know if you are in insert mode half the time, and start typing random characters all over the place.
Re: WAT Driven Development
#20The ESC key in vi is idempotent . It's not doing it wrong to hit it thousands of times. It's doing it wrong to have to model the state of your editor in your head. I have a similar habit of typing "git " in my terminal, and then getting distracted while I think through what I'm trying to do, and then just typing "git " again. Rather than punish myself, I just wrote a script called git-git. https://github.com/jes5199/…
" It's doing it wrong to have to model the state of your editor in your head " WAT? By that logic you don't know if you are in insert mode half the time, and start typing random characters all over the place.