Does using the tag have any negative effect on the semantic markup of a page? I see that it doesn't impact screen-readers but what about if someone is trying to parse your HTML?
Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
11–20 of 96 posts
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#12I am close to dropping in Font Awesome, but the small font sizes really need work. Here is a comparison screenshot of the standard bootstrap sprites vs font awesome sprites in Chrome on Mac: https://s3.amazonaws.com/gusta/sprites-less-vs-font-awesome-...
Again, awesome work. Font Awesome is on my short list to use once it's cleaned up a bit.
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#13First, this is great. The Bootstrap Sprites definitely need some love and this is a solid forward step. I am close to dropping in Font Awesome, but the small font sizes really need work. Here is a comparison screenshot of the standard bootstrap sprites vs font awesome sprites in Chrome on Mac: https://s3.amazonaws.com/gusta/sprites-less-vs-font-awesome-... Again, awesome work. Font Awesome is on my short list to use…
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#14Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#15First, this is great. The Bootstrap Sprites definitely need some love and this is a solid forward step. I am close to dropping in Font Awesome, but the small font sizes really need work. Here is a comparison screenshot of the standard bootstrap sprites vs font awesome sprites in Chrome on Mac: https://s3.amazonaws.com/gusta/sprites-less-vs-font-awesome-... Again, awesome work. Font Awesome is on my short list to use…
Thanks for the example. I'll start work on hinting next to see what I can do at the default size.
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#16Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#17Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#18That technique is not compatible with browsers that do not support the :before pseudo-class (eg. IE7). The icons could be used though, but not that way.
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#19It says “Wide @font-face support means Font Awesome even works in IE4” but not as the way it is implemented on the demo page. That technique is not compatible with browsers that do not support the :before pseudo-class (eg. IE7). The icons could be used though, but not that way.
Re: Font Awesome, the pictographic font designed for use with Twitter Bootstrap
#20Is this something you can elaborate on?