Live data from Hacker News

Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

servethehome.com

11–20 of 526 posts

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#11

In theory I liked these things. ...but in practice I never got one, because they were always so expensive. The same hardware can be found in a laptop for much less.

Same story. I looked at a NUC as a possible SFF PC, balked at the price, and ended up buying a Lenovo M93p Tiny off a guy on Craigslist for a lot less.

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#13
I had a 6th gen and now a 11th gen NUC (both used) as a little home server to run docker/plex . (since the intel chips can do transcoding pretty well). Runs so well, cool and quiet in a closet shelf.

They will be missed, I guess I'll have to look at similar devices from non-Intel in the future.

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#14

I'm not on the up-and-up with Intel. I know they're building a fab in Ohio... generally, does anyone know what their next moves are meant to be? I'm curious to hear about their business plan -- I know they've been lagging some other producers in recent years.

"Catch up to TSMC at 1.8nm" is the dream. So fabbing other customers' stuff. On the product side, Intel seems to be doubling down on GPUs, in spite of troubling rumors about Arc gen 2. Of course the question is what will be on time and what will be delayed. Previous delays obliterated the product lineups Intel meticulously planned before.

Any links to said "troubling rumors about Arc Gen 2"?

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#15
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Catch up to TSMC at 1.8nm" is the dream. So fabbing other customers' stuff. On the product side, Intel seems to be doubling down on GPUs, in spite of troubling rumors about Arc gen 2. Of course the question is what will be on time and what will be delayed. Previous delays obliterated the product lineups Intel meticulously planned before.

Yes, "5 nodes in 4 years" is the rallying cry of the company right now.

Hasn't this been the case for years? "Okay, we didn't get this node, but the next one or the one after that is totally ours"

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#17

The price was an issue. Not being fanless was another issue. So mac mini is the "best nuc" available.

Is there a mac mini model that hits a sweet spot on price and performance? I’d love to run a little cluster of mac minis. Maybe one of the intel ones so you could just throw on linux and something like slurm or pbs?

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#19
post #11

In theory I liked these things. ...but in practice I never got one, because they were always so expensive. The same hardware can be found in a laptop for much less.

Same story. I looked at a NUC as a possible SFF PC, balked at the price, and ended up buying a Lenovo M93p Tiny off a guy on Craigslist for a lot less.

I fell in love with Lenovo and HP SFF/'tiny pcs' a couple years ago. It can be tricky to find ample display outs in a preferred hardware configuration but otherwise they've been cheap, quiet, reliable and efficient. I realized as much as I like the tech and even idea of gaming, I don't game much anymore at all so without the need for a proper GPU these things have really simplified computing in my life to the point I have very capable extra hardware for projects and experiments ready to just plug in and go. 10/10 will buy more again

Re: Intel exiting the PC business as it stops investment in the Intel NUC

#20
We bought a couple of i7 NUCs every time a new generation was launched, mainly to have access to the latest GPU features.

That is, we hoped to use Intel's MFX Media SDK for transcoding h264 (or even h265) video. Unfortunately both the SDK and the hardware were too much of a moving target, going from software to hardware only, Windows only then later linux only on CentOS, then only on Ubuntu, then (partially) open source. Dropping support for older generations, breaking API changes. Opaque licensing policies.

At some point we gave up and simply went with ffmpeg. Works great on AMD too, or ARM for that matter.

Still using a NUC as main development machine, extremely fast and mostly quiet.

Post reply on HN