They then transitioned to become part of the system themselves, as an Exchange ... while continuing to expose funds (their own, and their customers) to high risk-reward scenarios, again/still, on their competitors platforms. What else is there?? in the small pond that is the crypto-verse.
That degree, and unwise configuration, of exposure is what caused the collapse.
I don't believe that Ponzis central tenet - to sustain only via new entrants - was ever their long term business tactic. The fact that Alameda/FTX ended in the final flailing desperation of an extremely poorly piloted sinking ship was its own indictment, but that doesn't make them 'a Ponzi from the beginning'.