With these driverless cabs, will a person still be behind the wheel ? Or is no one there. If not, what happens if an accident occurs and the cab keeps on driving due to a software bug ?
San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
11–20 of 93 posts
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#12With these driverless cabs, will a person still be behind the wheel ? Or is no one there. If not, what happens if an accident occurs and the cab keeps on driving due to a software bug ?
There are overseers who are remotely monitoring vehicle telemetry. If there is an accident, the company will know before anyone else and will respond accordingly.
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#13I think this is just complacency and a bias towards how things are; imagine a world in which biking is safe, pedestrians are safe, and huge amounts of the city don't have to be devoted to parking. That's what 24/7 driverless cars can enable.
We need to get rid of cars altogether, with exceptions for emergency services etc.
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#14Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#15Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#16I think this is just complacency and a bias towards how things are; imagine a world in which biking is safe, pedestrians are safe, and huge amounts of the city don't have to be devoted to parking. That's what 24/7 driverless cars can enable.
I, for one, don’t want to live in a world where my ability to go anywhere is decided by Google and Uber.
Big Tech has way, way too much power already. Please don’t give them any more of it.
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#17Individual motorized transport is a dead end, especially in cities, no matter if it has a driver or not. It's just inherently energy- and space efficient to haul around a two ton piece of junk per 80kg person. Cities don't have the space, the planet doesn't have the energy to support it. We need to ban cars from cities in the longer term, both human- and AI-driven. For now, we need to take steps to get there. Reduce…
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#18Individual motorized transport is a dead end, especially in cities, no matter if it has a driver or not. It's just inherently energy- and space efficient to haul around a two ton piece of junk per 80kg person. Cities don't have the space, the planet doesn't have the energy to support it. We need to ban cars from cities in the longer term, both human- and AI-driven. For now, we need to take steps to get there. Reduce…
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#19I think this is just complacency and a bias towards how things are; imagine a world in which biking is safe, pedestrians are safe, and huge amounts of the city don't have to be devoted to parking. That's what 24/7 driverless cars can enable.
In this world, we'll still have giant hunks of steel zooming around our cities, creating noise, taking up space and wasting energy to move themselves around (the payload to weight ratio of cars is abysmal). We need to get rid of cars altogether, with exceptions for emergency services etc.
Where I live, it gets so brutally hot and humid in the summer that people literally collapse and die if they do anything much outdoors.
Re: San Francisco may soon get 24/7 driverless cabs. City leaders are fuming
#20what if a thug stayed in the car an robbed every new rider? What if the homeless camped in the car?