A tangential question...but does anyone know what software is used to generate legal documents that look like the PDF linked in the article? I’ve played with LaTeX templates a bit, but I seriously doubt law firms are futzing around with LaTeX for documents as complex as this. They must have some software that produces this formatting.
In my sample size of one, an attorney I talked to said that Microsoft Word was the most important software he and his colleagues used. So my guess is they're just really good with Word.
Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
11–20 of 231 posts
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#12Hard to understand how this is a crime, or how they came up with 3 billion dollars of damage. Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.
Surely, there is some pretty large subset of things where "if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software" does not hold up?
So how about the default is "not allowed"
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#13When this happened to Stable Diffusion, it was easy for me to consider it a necessary evil to progress humanity. When this happens to closedAI, it just seems like a profit grab. Not that it changes the legality of it. Just optics. Wonder if that matters in court.
Then they came for the writers, but I did not speak out because I was not a writer.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me... well, except ChatGPT.
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#14Hard to understand how this is a crime, or how they came up with 3 billion dollars of damage. Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.
If you ask ChatGPT the rules for D&D, the private sourcebooks are all in there.
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#15A tangential question...but does anyone know what software is used to generate legal documents that look like the PDF linked in the article? I’ve played with LaTeX templates a bit, but I seriously doubt law firms are futzing around with LaTeX for documents as complex as this. They must have some software that produces this formatting.
In my sample size of one, an attorney I talked to said that Microsoft Word was the most important software he and his colleagues used. So my guess is they're just really good with Word.
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#16Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#17Well, it was too good to be true. Reminds me of the early days of music sharing and Napster.
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#18Hard to understand how this is a crime, or how they came up with 3 billion dollars of damage. Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.
> The lawsuit is seeking class-action certification and damages of $3 billion – though that figure is presumably a placeholder. Any actual damages would be determined if the plaintiffs prevail, based on the findings of the court.
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#19Hard to understand how this is a crime, or how they came up with 3 billion dollars of damage. Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.
Obtained from (check notes) public internet forums
> For the 16 plaintiffs, the complaint indicates that they used ChatGPT, as well as other internet services like Reddit, and expected that their digital interactions would not be incorporated into an AI model.
You've got to be incredibly naive if you think public Reddit data isn't used to train ML models, not least by Reddit themselves
Re: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violations'
#20Interesting, for once this doesn't have anything to do with the GDPR. It's by 16 (US) individuals, filing the complaint in SF.