Live data from Hacker News

The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

responsiblestatecraft.org

11–20 of 387 posts

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#11

Aren't these kind of odd prices usually just laundering money for black projects?

They would have to be making quite a bit of these to be able to get necessary funds. Mostly it’s just custom parts and the mfg is adding large margins but again on very low numbers of widgets.

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#12

Aren't these kind of odd prices usually just laundering money for black projects?

Sometimes, but not always. People tend to underestimate how much costs are coming from certification, testing and corresponding warranties.

The F-117 so did canabalize quite some "spares" bought for the F-16 and F-15 fleets.

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#15

Aren't these kind of odd prices usually just laundering money for black projects?

Sometimes, but not always. People tend to underestimate how much costs are coming from certification, testing and corresponding warranties. The F-117 so did canabalize quite some "spares" bought for the F-16 and F-15 fleets.

A trash can needs to be tested and certified for use in the Pentagon?

... holding a small collection of waste is that intense eh?

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#16

If its going on an aircraft and it's no longer made or stocked, then yes there will be extra cost as it has to go through certification, testing, flammability, tooling and various other things. So while the top line price may be high for the bin, but a breakdown of costs would indicate where the money is going. Overcharging? perhaps and possible, but more info needed.

Umm, no. A 17,000% increase in price for a TRASH CAN is not justified under any circumstance. That is straight up robbery that Boeing knows they can get away with.

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#17

If its going on an aircraft and it's no longer made or stocked, then yes there will be extra cost as it has to go through certification, testing, flammability, tooling and various other things. So while the top line price may be high for the bin, but a breakdown of costs would indicate where the money is going. Overcharging? perhaps and possible, but more info needed.

All the certifications for all that were done well before. This price change only began in 2020. Boeing had been charging $300 for the trash can for at least a decade prior. The current change is just exploiting the system.

Moreover the 707, which is basically what these trash cans were made for, entered service in _1957_.

Sometimes a spade is just a spade, greed is just greed and you don't need to bend over backwards to find an excuse for bigcorp.

Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can

#20

If its going on an aircraft and it's no longer made or stocked, then yes there will be extra cost as it has to go through certification, testing, flammability, tooling and various other things. So while the top line price may be high for the bin, but a breakdown of costs would indicate where the money is going. Overcharging? perhaps and possible, but more info needed.

Umm, no. A 17,000% increase in price for a TRASH CAN is not justified under any circumstance. That is straight up robbery that Boeing knows they can get away with.

Blame Boeing or the government willing to pay it?
Post reply on HN