11–20 of 85 posts
The author appears motivated by some... interesting... beliefs. Hard to tell if this entire thing is a joke or not. https://github.com/kyegomez/EXA#for-humanity https://blog.apac.ai/liberation-awaits EDIT: the author seems to be releasing poor implementations of recent papers in an attempt to drive attention towards an AI-related death cult.
The answer to that is - yes, but it is: costly, slow, there is node collapse, it impacts context length, it injects biases.
IDK if our current models have enough of "mode 1" to power this system. It's also plausible that our current "mode 1" systems are more than powerful enough and that inference speed (and thus the size/depth of the tree that can be explored) will be the most important factor.
I hope that the major players are looking at this and trying it out at scale (I know Deepmind wrote the orginal paper, but their benchmarks were quite unimpressive). It's plausible that we will have an AlphaGo moment with this scheme.
The author appears motivated by some... interesting... beliefs. Hard to tell if this entire thing is a joke or not. https://github.com/kyegomez/EXA#for-humanity https://blog.apac.ai/liberation-awaits EDIT: the author seems to be releasing poor implementations of recent papers in an attempt to drive attention towards an AI-related death cult.
I think these are pretty typical beliefs among AI researchers, they don't normally write it down on github though.
The author appears motivated by some... interesting... beliefs. Hard to tell if this entire thing is a joke or not. https://github.com/kyegomez/EXA#for-humanity https://blog.apac.ai/liberation-awaits EDIT: the author seems to be releasing poor implementations of recent papers in an attempt to drive attention towards an AI-related death cult.
Wow. Lick, don’t sniff, the fresh paint.
I went through this in a video using the paper's official code - and it worked fairly well!
Definitely a great step forward in terms of reasoning tasks - even if it is an expensive step.
The author appears motivated by some... interesting... beliefs. Hard to tell if this entire thing is a joke or not. https://github.com/kyegomez/EXA#for-humanity https://blog.apac.ai/liberation-awaits EDIT: the author seems to be releasing poor implementations of recent papers in an attempt to drive attention towards an AI-related death cult.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think these are pretty typical beliefs among AI researchers, they don't normally write it down on github though.
How typical are you thinking? I'd guess less than 10%, there's a lot of AI researchers and this is just one strain of thought.
And an unchained LLM trained on reality is far more capable of finding solutions to that problem than a bunch of squabbling politicians.
The author appears motivated by some... interesting... beliefs. Hard to tell if this entire thing is a joke or not. https://github.com/kyegomez/EXA#for-humanity https://blog.apac.ai/liberation-awaits EDIT: the author seems to be releasing poor implementations of recent papers in an attempt to drive attention towards an AI-related death cult.