The XY Problem (2014)
11–20 of 105 posts
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#12In my life experience, 95% of the troubles with the XY problem stem from the fact that the people are not aware that they have over-fixated on the potential solution Y for the problem X. They quickly assumed it, solidified it in their heads, and then most of the time spent with them is allocated to making them disentangle Y from X. Once that happens, the solution has usually presented itself already at this point --…
The obvious ones are buying a new computer to use a resource intensive software. There might be options to upgrade the existing parts to cleanly meet the requirements, borrow/rent a machine for the length of the project, spin up a machine in a cloud, straight ask someone else with an adequate machine to inherint the task etc.
Those could all be more optimal solutions, but I'd still totally ask for a new computer instead.
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#13Or the P problem: being so patronising that, not content with patronising individuals one at a time, you buy a domain so you can patronise the whole world.
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#14I often encounter the opposite. I would have a complex problem that I can legitimately solve by something reasonably simple yet I don’t posses the expertise on. Asking how to do Y, I need to spend an godawful amount of time wasting to convince people that no, it really is not an XY problem, and could we just focus on the literal problem description, which you could answer in like 3 minutes, instead of you trying to s…
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#15Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#16I often encounter the opposite. I would have a complex problem that I can legitimately solve by something reasonably simple yet I don’t posses the expertise on. Asking how to do Y, I need to spend an godawful amount of time wasting to convince people that no, it really is not an XY problem, and could we just focus on the literal problem description, which you could answer in like 3 minutes, instead of you trying to s…
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#17Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#18I often encounter the opposite. I would have a complex problem that I can legitimately solve by something reasonably simple yet I don’t posses the expertise on. Asking how to do Y, I need to spend an godawful amount of time wasting to convince people that no, it really is not an XY problem, and could we just focus on the literal problem description, which you could answer in like 3 minutes, instead of you trying to s…
Yeah the whole premise of the "XY" problem seems like it was written up by someone who regulars Stack Overflow. It's pretty frustrating when the highest-upvotes answer to a question is "actually you don't want to do that. do something else instead".
I, Raymond Chen, Charles Cazabon, and Eric S. Raymond didn't use that name at all.
I, in particular, chose a name that reinforced the an important part of the concept, missed in this discussion here, that the problem was nonsensical as posed.
* https://jdebp.uk/FGA/put-down-the-chocolate-covered-banana.h...
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah the whole premise of the "XY" problem seems like it was written up by someone who regulars Stack Overflow. It's pretty frustrating when the highest-upvotes answer to a question is "actually you don't want to do that. do something else instead".
It wasn't. Mark-Jason Dominus was the cause of that name. I, Raymond Chen, Charles Cazabon, and Eric S. Raymond didn't use that name at all. I, in particular, chose a name that reinforced the an important part of the concept, missed in this discussion here, that the problem was nonsensical as posed . * https://jdebp.uk/FGA/put-down-the-chocolate-covered-banana.h...
Re: The XY Problem (2014)
#20Without people diverting into Y problems, we'd never have any tools.