Live data from Hacker News

Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

andreasfragner.com

11–20 of 167 posts

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#11
post #6

For context, this article is specifically referring to reading for comprehension (not for pleasure).

I don’t see why it wouldn’t apply to both? I just finished crime & punishment and could see how this summary strategy would help better understand the book.

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#14
Well it really depends what your goals are, right? What kind of books are you reading, to what end? I personally struggle to think of any book I have engaged with which I got value out of, that could be meaningfully summarized in a couple of hours. The author was an expert on the subject and they only managed to summarize it down to a few hundred pages - if there was only a couple of pages worth of ideas in there presumably they would have just written a blogpost.

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#15
Strong agree from me, though what I do is less involved than the article. I normally just take a few per-chapter summary notes in an org-mode outline, in a filename that starts with the year I read the book.

Recently I started creating my own topic index with pointers to which books I found certain insights in. I know I could generate such a thing automatically with tagging, but I enjoy manually curating my index.

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#16
I’m at 47 books read this year so far and mostly disagree with the author of the article. When you find a book that’s worth summarizing, do it. But I get exposed to many more ideas (and find the ones worth thinking about more) simply by reading more.

Also, I just like reading. My goal isn’t to have some kind of personal knowledge base to prove how much I’ve comprehended to myself.

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#18

I’m at 47 books read this year so far and mostly disagree with the author of the article. When you find a book that’s worth summarizing, do it. But I get exposed to many more ideas (and find the ones worth thinking about more) simply by reading more. Also, I just like reading. My goal isn’t to have some kind of personal knowledge base to prove how much I’ve comprehended to myself.

If getting exposed to a lot of ideas is the goal then spending your life on this site and reddit would be the way to go.

Re: Writing summaries is more important than reading more books

#20

ChatGPT will do this. But also, try quizzing yourself about what you’ve read the day before. I bet the retention is slim.

Sure, ChatGPT can do this. Just like you could drive a car over a marathon route. That’s not the point though, the point of summarizing is to force yourself to understand. It’s the journey not the destination that’s important.
Post reply on HN