Article is a bit breathless. > and can be viewed using a microscope capable of 1000x magnification—a technology that has been available for hundreds of years. I don't think so; maybe 100 years. To achieve 1,000x magnification with an optical microscope, you need oil (or some other fluid with a refractive index similar to that of the lens) between the objective lens and the subject. I believe the maximum theoretical m…
A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
11–20 of 69 posts
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#12Article is a bit breathless. > and can be viewed using a microscope capable of 1000x magnification—a technology that has been available for hundreds of years. I don't think so; maybe 100 years. To achieve 1,000x magnification with an optical microscope, you need oil (or some other fluid with a refractive index similar to that of the lens) between the objective lens and the subject. I believe the maximum theoretical m…
According to random online articles, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) achieved 275x and a few of his instruments have survived until today, in museums, I presume.
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#13The idea we can move so far away with such complicated processes without any contamination is just a dream, no matter the precautions we take. We can just limit it to the minimum, which is already quite amazing.
So the israeli ones are just the one we know about.
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#14Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#15Tardigrades, sure. But they're out there!
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#16Article is a bit breathless. > and can be viewed using a microscope capable of 1000x magnification—a technology that has been available for hundreds of years. I don't think so; maybe 100 years. To achieve 1,000x magnification with an optical microscope, you need oil (or some other fluid with a refractive index similar to that of the lens) between the objective lens and the subject. I believe the maximum theoretical m…
Are you sure? I ask because the Dutch were wild by the end of the seventeenth century, people like Antoni van Leeuwenhoek achieved 500x magnification with a single lens microscope as an example. If you wonder why I know this, it’s because this was when the first bacteria are believed to have been observed. Leading off to the next part that I’m not so sure of, but the single lens microscope was/is terrible to use, and…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186497/
https://www.nsf.gov/news/speeches/colwell/rc01_anatlesson/ts...
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#17Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#18The chances that none of the made-made objects that touched the moon carried a few tardigrades is very small anyway. The idea we can move so far away with such complicated processes without any contamination is just a dream, no matter the precautions we take. We can just limit it to the minimum, which is already quite amazing. So the israeli ones are just the one we know about.
Yes, but much easier to condemn in the General Assembly.
Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#19Re: A Crashed Israeli Lunar Lander Spilled Tardigrades on the Moon (2019)
#20"tardigraves find a way." wikipedia: They have been found in diverse regions of Earth's biosphere – mountaintops, the deep sea, tropical rainforests, and the Antarctic. Tardigrades are among the most resilient animals known, with individual species able to survive extreme conditions – such as exposure to extreme temperatures, extreme pressures (both high and low), air deprivation, radiation, dehydration, and starvati…