U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
11–20 of 199 posts
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#12[flagged]
The world was basically a dystopian hell for the non-elite class and only getting worse from the advent of agriculture until somewhat recently (see the Malthusian Trap)...
But today is the worst because you can look back to sometime post-WW2 in the US (and only the US), where - for a few years - things maybe might have been slightly better if and only if you were a white man.
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#13[flagged]
Statements like this need more of a thesis. There are not enough details in your comment to have any kind of a productive, non-flamebait discussion.
- Revoke their "personhood"
- Tax them appropriately
- Prevent them from being too big to fail
- Hold their officers accountable
- Prevent them from hiring public officials
But I'm open to other ideas!
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#14Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#15[flagged]
There are many issues at play here. For example: extreme political divisiveness, decreasing real incomes, falling birth rates, increased competition due to globalization, doomscrolling ...and many others.
If I personally had to pick the largest factor, I would blame social media induced anxiety/depression due to the personal issues that arise from comparing your life to the artificial portrayals. That and the dopamine addiction from tiktok, snapchat that causes people to withdraw from applying effort in the real world.
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#16[flagged]
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#17Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#18The rates of people diagnosed with depression. Things that were once taboos, had stigma attached to them, or were poorly defined may once have been more often kept under wraps. See ADHD or ASD diagnosis rates, for example.
Re: U.S. Depression Rates Reach New Highs
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does that follow? The implication is that the USA would have less depression if there were no corporations. I disagree.
As much as I disagree with engaging with GP's non-comment, I also don't think this is really steel-manning their assumed point-of-view. Likely they are thinking of a society where corporations are "different" rather than "abolished".