Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

wsj.com

11–20 of 86 posts

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#11
post #4

Fusion is not just another way to power our lightbulbs it's a completely different kind of energy. Two unique properties of energy density like Fusion. 1. The ability to hit 10% of the speed of light in space 2. The ability to create fundamental elements like gold, silver etc. Another good example of the fact that there are no scarcity of resources only scarcity of knowledge. Resources are created not found. Edit: Wh…

Fusion releases energy when producing items lighter than iron. It requires energy to create atoms heavier than iron via fusion. It would cost huge amounts of money to produce an ounce of silver or gold that way.

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#12
post #6

Given the implications of this technology I wonder how much development is actually being done "in the open". And therefore how close to a breakthrough we are, whether a breakthrough has already occured and we are being fed delayed findings, and ultimately how a private organization like Microsoft would truly be able to access matured tech. Whether by incentive or by coercion, it feels like the DOD and the DOE would…

Disruption outside of the government eye is common, I wouldn’t be surprised. Those organizations focus on nuclear weapons tech.

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#13
post #4

Fusion is not just another way to power our lightbulbs it's a completely different kind of energy. Two unique properties of energy density like Fusion. 1. The ability to hit 10% of the speed of light in space 2. The ability to create fundamental elements like gold, silver etc. Another good example of the fact that there are no scarcity of resources only scarcity of knowledge. Resources are created not found. Edit: Wh…

Fusion releases energy when producing items lighter than iron. It requires energy to create atoms heavier than iron via fusion. It would cost huge amounts of money to produce an ounce of silver or gold that way.

However, the gold standard is no more.

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#14
post #6

Given the implications of this technology I wonder how much development is actually being done "in the open". And therefore how close to a breakthrough we are, whether a breakthrough has already occured and we are being fed delayed findings, and ultimately how a private organization like Microsoft would truly be able to access matured tech. Whether by incentive or by coercion, it feels like the DOD and the DOE would…

Disruption outside of the government eye is common, I wouldn’t be surprised. Those organizations focus on nuclear weapons tech.

DOE also covers domestic nuclear power generation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_...

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#15
post #5

Given that Helios hasn’t demonstrated production of any amount of energy from fusion, this is probably just bullshit, like the United “order” for supersonic jets from Boom a few months ago. Similarly, Boom has not even flown a prototype yet.

Helios is building real facilities. Maybe it won't work, but it's not just drafting CAD templates — they are deploying capital into physical reactors. That's not bullshit.

Not only that but the reactor they're building now is their seventh. They kept their previous reactor under vacuum for 16 months, did thousands of fusion pulses, and achieved 100 million degree plasma temperatures.

https://www.helionenergy.com/articles/ending-trenta-operatio...

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#17
post #6

Given the implications of this technology I wonder how much development is actually being done "in the open". And therefore how close to a breakthrough we are, whether a breakthrough has already occured and we are being fed delayed findings, and ultimately how a private organization like Microsoft would truly be able to access matured tech. Whether by incentive or by coercion, it feels like the DOD and the DOE would…

Are most fusion reactor designs a national security concern? I am not a nuclear physicist but from my rudimentary understanding of most modern approaches I don’t see how they would help with bad stuff (other than creating material for a dirty bomb through waste perhaps)

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#19
post #6

Given the implications of this technology I wonder how much development is actually being done "in the open". And therefore how close to a breakthrough we are, whether a breakthrough has already occured and we are being fed delayed findings, and ultimately how a private organization like Microsoft would truly be able to access matured tech. Whether by incentive or by coercion, it feels like the DOD and the DOE would…

Are most fusion reactor designs a national security concern? I am not a nuclear physicist but from my rudimentary understanding of most modern approaches I don’t see how they would help with bad stuff (other than creating material for a dirty bomb through waste perhaps)

Energy independence would upend a lot of international trade markets and therefore geopolitical stability in some areas. If you don't need Saudi Arabia for oil, why do you care what happens there?

Re: Microsoft Bets That Fusion Power Is Closer Than Many Think

#20
post #5

Given that Helios hasn’t demonstrated production of any amount of energy from fusion, this is probably just bullshit, like the United “order” for supersonic jets from Boom a few months ago. Similarly, Boom has not even flown a prototype yet.

I'm not sure why you're so negative on a business model that has worked for tech startups for decades now. Many businesses have started by promising to fix a problem experienced by a larger entity. Along with product guidance, the startup often gets capital in the form of investment. The larger company gets a low-risk attempt to solve their problem with the possibility of upside in the case of a larger than expected success.
Post reply on HN