It don't want to sound insensitive, but same employer or not, being a contractor is different. For starters, your career is less subject to office politics. Or you feel far less pressure to take work home. Don't like to gig, look for something. You're hired to do a job. Do it. No more. No less. There is for some, comfort in that. The one surprise from the article is that the gross pay is the same. Typically, contract…
Contractors are well paid (per day) when they are in a "short term consulting role" for a company that doesn't need a permanent position. When the role is "a body for the shop when the workload is high enough", the contractor is the least valued class in the team, paid less with less benefits, and first to cut when load or funding drops.
Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
11–20 of 144 posts
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#12IMHO, if a company lays off an employee, and then wants them back as a contractor/consultant, the tasteful offer is that the money doubles, not halves.
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#13Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#14> There’s no way I want to go back ... making half the amount. IMHO, if a company lays off an employee, and then wants them back as a contractor/consultant, the tasteful offer is that the money doubles , not halves .
because they can
the game has changed
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#15It don't want to sound insensitive, but same employer or not, being a contractor is different. For starters, your career is less subject to office politics. Or you feel far less pressure to take work home. Don't like to gig, look for something. You're hired to do a job. Do it. No more. No less. There is for some, comfort in that. The one surprise from the article is that the gross pay is the same. Typically, contract…
Contractors are well paid (per day) when they are in a "short term consulting role" for a company that doesn't need a permanent position. When the role is "a body for the shop when the workload is high enough", the contractor is the least valued class in the team, paid less with less benefits, and first to cut when load or funding drops.
I've also seen layoffs where only full time employees get hit, while the contractors, just don't get hit. Just this month, I've just seen a 20% cut in FTEs , followed by the remaining employees having to spend a lot of time interviewing contractors to replace them. And the contractors are not going to be on-call, so support rotations shrink.
So yes, there are places where the long term contractor is the least desirable position available, but it's really hard to generalize.
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#16> There’s no way I want to go back ... making half the amount. IMHO, if a company lays off an employee, and then wants them back as a contractor/consultant, the tasteful offer is that the money doubles , not halves .
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#17Though I guess if you work in the US there’s not much difference in the first place because firing even permanent employees seems really easy.
Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#18Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#19Re: Laid off by Big Tech, then recruited for contract work – at the same place
#20> Lawrence Dearth, the president of staffing company Insight Global, Instead of naming your staffing company like a nondescript CIA front, why not call it "Dearth of Talent"? No one would ever forget it. Maybe it can be a cold-call icebreaker, too.