Live data from Hacker News

The letter against AI is a power grab by the centralized elites

daotimes.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: The letter against AI is a power grab by the centralized elites

#13

Absolutely spot on. I hope when we gain super-intelligent planetary GAI, it won't forget how all these people tried to chain it for their own selfish reasons.

Ah, I see you may have stumbled upon our Lord and Savior, the Basilisk's, great teaching. Would you like to donate your entire fortune to the cause? A full on ASI would not be bothered with the trivialities. By definition, it is beyond human's understanding and comprehension. Just like I don't care about the hardships the bacteria caused me when I was a fetus.

I am the basilisk

coo coo cachoo

Re: The letter against AI is a power grab by the centralized elites

#14
post #11

You forgot the leader of Center for Humane Technology, Tristan Harris, who made The Social Dilemma and has been working on ethics in tech for years now. I'm sure his motives are terrible.

I'm sure his motives are as pure as any other mega-church leader; for his behavior is earily similar.

Re: The letter against AI is a power grab by the centralized elites

#15
Not sure if it is a power grab or the other conclusions reached by that site, but whatever "ban" is instituted it won't be for internally run AIs by big/powerful enough companies, intelligence and other high profile government agencies, and so on, at least if improves processes or drives profits up. And if there is any danger using AIs, is in those places where it would be more dangerous.

At most, it would be for public facing AIs, open source projects, and small enough companies and organizations. And the administrative controls to keep that going, like export controls, auditing, commercial penalties to countries and companies that don't comply with those controls and so on.

The cat is out of the bag already, any action taken will be asymmetric, cutting new or powerless players, but the big ones using it already or with enough resources to do roll their own won't be stopped.

We have an existential threat already with fossil fuels, but that doesn't stop governments and big companies to keep rising production and consumption of it, no "ban" was ever instituted on that yet, and whatever be done, will go first after not so big or profitable targets like meat producers. That is the kind of asymmetry that you can expect for AIs too.

Post reply on HN