What is group?
Some context would be really nice indeed.
https://gist.github.com/chrispsn/3450fe6172a7cc441d0819379ed... <- Here you go, some context about what group is and does (or was and did, in this case) in the K language.
K: We need to talk about group
11–20 of 102 posts
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#12It’s awe-inspiring to see a K program where the comments are in another APL variant (I can’t pretend to know which):
{d:~1=':s:^x / s‿e←1⊸»⊸(>⋈Re: K: We need to talk about group
#13It’s awe-inspiring to see a K program where the comments are in another APL variant (I can’t pretend to know which): {d:~1=':s:^x / s‿e←1⊸»⊸(>⋈ This program implements a Pigdog Latin translator, bien sûr .
this looks like some compiled program's binary viewed as unicode WTF
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#14is there any way i can try this out?
ngn k : https://codeberg.org/ngn/k
kona : https://github.com/kevinlawler/kona
alto a javascript implementation even with a graphics library : https://github.com/JohnEarnest/ok
edit : assuming you were talking about k and not freq
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#15These line-noise programming languages read like a cruel joke on engineers in the finance world.
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#16It’s awe-inspiring to see a K program where the comments are in another APL variant (I can’t pretend to know which): {d:~1=':s:^x / s‿e←1⊸»⊸(>⋈ This program implements a Pigdog Latin translator, bien sûr .
I... just can't. I work a lot with data, so it sounds like it should be a good fit for what I do, but I find that writing the damn code in a normal language is much more productive. Maybe it's my brain that's wired wrong, but I fail to see how the entire construction is supposed to help.
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#17is there any way i can try this out?
ngn k : https://codeberg.org/ngn/k kona : https://github.com/kevinlawler/kona alto a javascript implementation even with a graphics library : https://github.com/JohnEarnest/ok edit : assuming you were talking about k and not freq
Ah, look at that ngn k link. They even golf the file names of the source code of the interpreter itself :D
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#18It’s awe-inspiring to see a K program where the comments are in another APL variant (I can’t pretend to know which): {d:~1=':s:^x / s‿e←1⊸»⊸(>⋈ This program implements a Pigdog Latin translator, bien sûr .
Isn't the original APL the only lang that uses actual Unicode symbols for operators?
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#19is there any way i can try this out?
Or you could try J. Another terse array language that uses ASCII symbols.
Re: K: We need to talk about group
#20It’s awe-inspiring to see a K program where the comments are in another APL variant (I can’t pretend to know which): {d:~1=':s:^x / s‿e←1⊸»⊸(>⋈ This program implements a Pigdog Latin translator, bien sûr .
Isn't the original APL the only lang that uses actual Unicode symbols for operators?
There’s also at least BQN, which I suspect is the language used in those comments: