11–20 of 1001 posts
He'll probably have a video out on this soon.
Prior to Edward's indictment he was thought be the future of the democratic party, if Edwards was convicted on all counts he faced up the 30 years in prison, he beat the charges though -- a rarity in federal prosecutions.
So there is precedent for indictments for this particular crime, not that this should matter, in a republic everyone is subject to the same law and jurisprudence.
[flagged]
LegalEagle has quite a few videos on the various investigations into Trump, his organization, and his associates if you're curious about process: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalEagle/search?query=grand%20jur... He'll probably have a video out on this soon.
[flagged]
LegalEagle has quite a few videos on the various investigations into Trump, his organization, and his associates if you're curious about process: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalEagle/search?query=grand%20jur... He'll probably have a video out on this soon.
[flagged]
edit: I can't reply, so...
Specific criticisms, please? The link is to a video with a Canadian lawyer and someone who might actually have a relevant opinion on US law who, several minutes in, can only seem to broadly and mockingly dismiss him without saying anything specific other than accuse him of being biased and mock him for crying. Biased is not the same as wrong.
edit 2: Specific as in: what has he been wrong about?
[flagged]
What do you mean? I want this, why would history be unkind to me?