I designed this system (not the chip, clearly), so feel free to ask any questions!
If you can provide a board to Alan, the lead dev of SatDump ( https://github.com/SatDump/SatDump ) to ensure compatability I'll 100% buy this board.
NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#12Why not use the ADRV9000 series? Or a newer afe like this guy: https://www.ti.com/product/AFE7903
(1) The AFE7903 wouldn't allow for any modularity in the system (look at what we are calling the RFNM interface on the website, I think that's the real reason this platform will work),
(2) Pricing, that single chip would cost in quantity 1k more than our current BOM, and you still need to add FPGAs, frontend, etc. next to it.
(3) Those single chip frontend modules don't have the embedded DSP cores we can use to do things like processing FFTs in real time and feeding them to a browser with no computing on the host, which I think will be very cool (multiple 160 MHz FFTs with a gr-phosphor like visualisation I think has never been done before at this price point).
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#13I designed this system (not the chip, clearly), so feel free to ask any questions!
What is the compatibility with existing SDR software?
It mentions multiple ADCs, can it work as a coherent receiver, similar to kraken?
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#14I designed this system (not the chip, clearly), so feel free to ask any questions!
Can this device work as a medium/short wave receiver? How low can the frequency go? Like, if one has this device, would it also replace something like RSPdx? What is the compatibility with existing SDR software? It mentions multiple ADCs, can it work as a coherent receiver, similar to kraken?
All existing SDR software should be supported via OsmoSDR.
Yes, it should work as a coherent receiver. There are some questions about unmatched I/Q pair trace lengths, but from what I heard from the experts as long as the clock is coherent (which it is), we should be able to correct those in software.
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#15Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#16Cool, how much is it?
As a comparison, $550 would be 10x to 20x less expensive than what's on the market today for similar bandwidth specs (Aaronia Spectran V6 and Ettus USRP).
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#17Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#18Sorry, u.fl connectors are horrible and I'll never buy a product that uses them.
But fair feedback, noted. I can't move the optional OCXO below the enclosure, as that would be taller than the aluminium block itself and require a slot breaking the RF shielding, but maybe I can move the connectors. I'll try and get creative.
Edit, surface-mount MMCX to the rescue? https://i.imgur.com/1GJhJa6.png
Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#19Re: NXP LA9310: A new platform for SDR and the 10-year-old AD9361 RF Transceiver
#20What are some examples of practical use cases for a platform like this? What are the benefits of this SDR platform compared to other solutions?