Eh it’s fine for tail risk alloc. If in a collapse scenario I think BTC will 40x and I put 2.5% into it, I’m covered.
In this case, are you expecting BTC will 40x nominally, or in real terms? If it goes 40x because the dollar loses all value then you’ll still have lost value in real terms.
No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
#12Eh it’s fine for tail risk alloc. If in a collapse scenario I think BTC will 40x and I put 2.5% into it, I’m covered.
If we have a collapse there could be a civil war of sorts so wouldn't be long before the power grid goes offline, then BTC will be useless almost instantly. Bullets and canned food will have far more value.
Re: No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
#13Re: No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
#14It's because stupid money moves fast and in stupid numbers.
Cryptocurrencies and NFTs are tulip bulbs: they're intrinsically worthless. At least you get flowers from bulbs.
Re: No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
#15Re: No, Bitcoin isn’t pumping because it’s a “safe haven” from banks
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
If we have a collapse there could be a civil war of sorts so wouldn't be long before the power grid goes offline, then BTC will be useless almost instantly. Bullets and canned food will have far more value.
Where has this happened? I’m thinking about something akin to Venezuela.