Live data from Hacker News

Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

thecradle.co

11–20 of 400 posts

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are out in the open enriching uranium to 84% with a breakout time to a weapon measured in weeks now, how many reasons do you need really?

Maybe they wouldn’t have done it had the US not bailed out on the Iran nuclear deal.

Maybe. Most probably they would have cheated. It is moot either way. There is no such thing as "fair" in geopolitics.

I don't see how a sane person thinks Iran getting the bomb is a good development or viable.

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#14
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are out in the open enriching uranium to 84% with a breakout time to a weapon measured in weeks now, how many reasons do you need really?

So? Its a perfectly rational course of action, no nuclear armed nation has ever been invaded and subjugated. If i ran a country building or acquiring a nuke would be top of my "To-do" list.

normally who complains about it lives in a country where They are out in the open enriching uranium to 84% with lock and loaded nuclear weapons already.

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#16
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe they wouldn’t have done it had the US not bailed out on the Iran nuclear deal.

Maybe. Most probably they would have cheated. It is moot either way. There is no such thing as "fair" in geopolitics. I don't see how a sane person thinks Iran getting the bomb is a good development or viable.

I agree in the sense that it comes down to a decision the US has to make on whether to invade Iran or not.

Just like with Iraq; wmd’s, weapons inspectors etc. are ultimately just a side show.

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe. Most probably they would have cheated. It is moot either way. There is no such thing as "fair" in geopolitics. I don't see how a sane person thinks Iran getting the bomb is a good development or viable.

I agree in the sense that it comes down to a decision the US has to make on whether to invade Iran or not. Just like with Iraq; wmd’s, weapons inspectors etc. are ultimately just a side show.

Nope, unlike Iraq and wmd's you have confirmation from multiple third parties and countries.

IAEA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Atomic_Energy_Ag...), France, Germany, UK, all are sounding the alarm.

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#18
post #2

[flagged]

nsenergybusiness.com is being fast and loose and not particulalry precise with technical mining jargon.

JORC standards have it that:

    A resource is that amount of a geologic commodity that exists in both discovered and undiscovered deposits—by definition, then, a “best guess.”

    Reserves are that subgroup of a resource that have been discovered, have a known size, and can be extracted at a profit.
[1] https://www.jorc.org/docs/JORC_code_2012.pdf

While this is an Australian standard it (and near equivilants) are the standards used on the largest mineral exchanges on the globe ( TSX et al )

The above 21 million tonne figure for Boliva is a best guess resource guesstimate and not an actual Proven Reserve estimate backed by sampling + geophysical survey + drilling + staged Technical Reports.

For that matter Iran here is asserting that they have an actual reserve backed by drill data and tech reports which leaves the question of:

Where is the published data?

Re: Iran discovers world’s second largest lithium reserve

#20
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are out in the open enriching uranium to 84% with a breakout time to a weapon measured in weeks now, how many reasons do you need really?

So? Its a perfectly rational course of action, no nuclear armed nation has ever been invaded and subjugated. If i ran a country building or acquiring a nuke would be top of my "To-do" list.

The fewer theocratic dictatorships with nukes the better. Its not that "Iran" as a construct having nukes is bad, its that the decisions to launch them lie with a few religious zealots who are known to not make good moral or ethical decisions.
Post reply on HN