Interesting. A few followup thoughts: - Can you share this analysis across a longer time span? - Maybe there's a way to normalize it to general activity on HN? It probably hasn't gone down, but it would be cleaner to do that.
Edit: typo.
11–20 of 120 posts
Interesting. A few followup thoughts: - Can you share this analysis across a longer time span? - Maybe there's a way to normalize it to general activity on HN? It probably hasn't gone down, but it would be cleaner to do that.
Edit: typo.
That's a nice way to visualize it. To me the best way to check the market conditions is to check your LinkedIn inbox. The number of recrutiers spamming with job offers has gone way down. I even had a situation where the recruiter who was supposed to hire me, got laid off during my final interview alongiside a big chunk of the company...
That's a nice way to visualize it. To me the best way to check the market conditions is to check your LinkedIn inbox. The number of recrutiers spamming with job offers has gone way down. I even had a situation where the recruiter who was supposed to hire me, got laid off during my final interview alongiside a big chunk of the company...
It's peculiar how the remote jobs graph follows the total graph so closely? Wouldn't you expect to see more noise?
What’s perverse, and not being discussed enough, is that this is an engineered recession. Rather than admit our economy no longer works, the Fed can alternate between low and high interest rates (inflation or unemployment, take your pick) and so, even though bad things are happening, the fact that it’s different bad stuff each year makes it look like the Fed is doing something.
We have an expected attrition rate at my company across all departments. We normally lose about 10 people per quarter. This quarter the number of people leaving - zero.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really what the graph shows is that the downturn in in-person positions has been minimal, but the downturn in remote work has been precipitous.
No, they're following the same trend. Remote jobs are consistently 75 % - 80 %.
It's peculiar how the remote jobs graph follows the total graph so closely? Wouldn't you expect to see more noise?
The downturn is hitting all companies and all jobs. It’s bad out there. What’s perverse, and not being discussed enough, is that this is an engineered recession. Rather than admit our economy no longer works, the Fed can alternate between low and high interest rates (inflation or unemployment, take your pick) and so, even though bad things are happening, the fact that it’s different bad stuff each year makes it look…
It's peculiar how the remote jobs graph follows the total graph so closely? Wouldn't you expect to see more noise?
The downturn is hitting all companies and all jobs. It’s bad out there. What’s perverse, and not being discussed enough, is that this is an engineered recession. Rather than admit our economy no longer works, the Fed can alternate between low and high interest rates (inflation or unemployment, take your pick) and so, even though bad things are happening, the fact that it’s different bad stuff each year makes it look…
What do you mean our economy no longer works?
We have an expected attrition rate at my company across all departments. We normally lose about 10 people per quarter. This quarter the number of people leaving - zero.