Not worth the effort. Best to learn k8s. Inertia is a thing; and k8s has the ecosystem behind it. It’s also a vibrant project and is evolving.
Best to stay the hell away from k8s if you care about being productive. You're not Google and we'll all be better for it when everyone admits that fact.
Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
11–20 of 47 posts
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#12Swarm was great. Docker/Moby should never have abandoned it. Kubernetes solves a similar class of problems to Swarm, but in a much more complex way. Sometimes that complexity helps solve problems. For many organizations, though, Swarm would have been the better option. Both Swarm and Kubernetes have their purposes. I'm sad that no option has popped up to replace Swarm in the "simple and easy container orchestration"…
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#13Not worth the effort. Best to learn k8s. Inertia is a thing; and k8s has the ecosystem behind it. It’s also a vibrant project and is evolving.
Best to stay the hell away from k8s if you care about being productive. You're not Google and we'll all be better for it when everyone admits that fact.
It's just that people need to start planning more before they dive into k8s, there's a limit to where and when k8s makes sense in your app. And most people could get away with the more traditional setup of Frontend, App and DB Backend for a service oriented architecture and still be able to scale up into k8s when necessary.
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#14Swarm was great. Docker/Moby should never have abandoned it. Kubernetes solves a similar class of problems to Swarm, but in a much more complex way. Sometimes that complexity helps solve problems. For many organizations, though, Swarm would have been the better option. Both Swarm and Kubernetes have their purposes. I'm sad that no option has popped up to replace Swarm in the "simple and easy container orchestration"…
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#15I really like the option to deploy through a git push without additional setup, and I am looking for something similar to host a bunch of containers. Does anyone here have experience with such a tool, and what is your experience regarding reliability?
You might want to check out dokku
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#16I really like the option to deploy through a git push without additional setup, and I am looking for something similar to host a bunch of containers. Does anyone here have experience with such a tool, and what is your experience regarding reliability?
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#17Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#18Not worth the effort. Best to learn k8s. Inertia is a thing; and k8s has the ecosystem behind it. It’s also a vibrant project and is evolving.
Best to stay the hell away from k8s if you care about being productive. You're not Google and we'll all be better for it when everyone admits that fact.
But for mature companies K8s can make a ton of sense.
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Best to stay the hell away from k8s if you care about being productive. You're not Google and we'll all be better for it when everyone admits that fact.
Meh. I find k8s + istio + cert manager pretty productive.
Re: Swarmlet: A self-hosted, open-source Platform as a Service
#20I have a use for something like this and was intending on building something similar. Unfortunately the whole thing is written in Bash.