Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
11–20 of 76 posts
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#12Mind blown that: -Some ~40% (stupid pie chart) don't have an SSL cert, but almost all have login/registration page (4 out of 4 that I randomly picked had a login/registration page) -So many people use GoDaddy as a registrar (they were horrible before SOPA) -That startups use AWS despite its poor cost/performance
what's horrible about GoDaddy? I used them for domain registration and DNS hosting, and everything went smoothly. The only annoying part, is how they try to sell additional goodies along the domain registration. the front page ladies weren't too much of disturbance either :)
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#13Mind blown that: -Some ~40% (stupid pie chart) don't have an SSL cert, but almost all have login/registration page (4 out of 4 that I randomly picked had a login/registration page) -So many people use GoDaddy as a registrar (they were horrible before SOPA) -That startups use AWS despite its poor cost/performance
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#14Mind blown that: -Some ~40% (stupid pie chart) don't have an SSL cert, but almost all have login/registration page (4 out of 4 that I randomly picked had a login/registration page) -So many people use GoDaddy as a registrar (they were horrible before SOPA) -That startups use AWS despite its poor cost/performance
what's horrible about GoDaddy? I used them for domain registration and DNS hosting, and everything went smoothly. The only annoying part, is how they try to sell additional goodies along the domain registration. the front page ladies weren't too much of disturbance either :)
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
what's horrible about GoDaddy? I used them for domain registration and DNS hosting, and everything went smoothly. The only annoying part, is how they try to sell additional goodies along the domain registration. the front page ladies weren't too much of disturbance either :)
I think he's referring to their recent support for SOPA: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3383564
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
what's horrible about GoDaddy? I used them for domain registration and DNS hosting, and everything went smoothly. The only annoying part, is how they try to sell additional goodies along the domain registration. the front page ladies weren't too much of disturbance either :)
Seriously? Aside from all of the normal things that are wrong with GoDaddy, where have you been for the past few weeks?
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#17Mind blown that: -Some ~40% (stupid pie chart) don't have an SSL cert, but almost all have login/registration page (4 out of 4 that I randomly picked had a login/registration page) -So many people use GoDaddy as a registrar (they were horrible before SOPA) -That startups use AWS despite its poor cost/performance
I agree on the SSL & GoDaddy, but AWS? What poor performance?
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#18Interesting stats; any chance to get data about the rest of the stack (web server, db, framework, etc)?
Have you seen underthesite.com?
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#19Do you have the 2009 or 2010 editions available anywhere ? Would be good to compare to see trends.
Re: Chart of Y Combinator companies' hosting decisions, 2011 edition
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think he's referring to their recent support for SOPA: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3383564
the parent comment refers to them being horrible before SOPA