Live data from Hacker News

Email marketing regulations around the world

github.com

11–20 of 30 posts

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#11

Question: How do I prove to the authorities that a subscriber has given consent? I imagine that an attribute on my "users" table is not enough?

“Double Opt In” is the way to go.

They sign up, then you send them an email and track when they hit the “I approve” link.

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#12
I live in Canada and I find it ridiculous that email without consent is illegal, phone calls without consent is illegal, but sending physical mail is perfectly fine. It makes me sad the amount of trees that must be cut down, shipped to a factory, processed into paper (with some hash chemicals), shipped to the printer, printed then shipped to me. Only to be thrown into the recycling unopened to be shipped to the recycling plant, then reprocessed to start the cycle over. It is just disgusting waste.

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#13

Question: How do I prove to the authorities that a subscriber has given consent? I imagine that an attribute on my "users" table is not enough?

In any reasonable law, you would prove that your procedures require consent before you start sending the emails. If you have to prove things about a specific user, you are already on unreasonable land.

(But then, I have no idea what places have reasonable rules. I have never seen any with this specific failure for email, but IANAL and I haven't looked much.)

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#14

Question: How do I prove to the authorities that a subscriber has given consent? I imagine that an attribute on my "users" table is not enough?

In any reasonable law, you would prove that your procedures require consent before you start sending the emails. If you have to prove things about a specific user, you are already on unreasonable land. (But then, I have no idea what places have reasonable rules. I have never seen any with this specific failure for email, but IANAL and I haven't looked much.)

Actually this sounds like common law to me. But yes, this should be enough to me.

However, if I consent to a User Agreement, do you really think they keep a copy of the specific version of the User Agreement I accepted?

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In any reasonable law, you would prove that your procedures require consent before you start sending the emails. If you have to prove things about a specific user, you are already on unreasonable land. (But then, I have no idea what places have reasonable rules. I have never seen any with this specific failure for email, but IANAL and I haven't looked much.)

Actually this sounds like common law to me. But yes, this should be enough to me. However, if I consent to a User Agreement, do you really think they keep a copy of the specific version of the User Agreement I accepted?

They almost certainly keep a copy of that specific version of the UA. They also very likely keep a log of you agreeing to it. And probably none of those would matter in a court (what you actually say on your site and how reasonable the document is certainly matter a lot more).

Anyway, UA acceptance does not require and does not imply in opt-in to your marketing emails.

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#16
post #4

GDPR (EU and UK) is much more nuanced than this makes out. For example, there are a number of legal bases that can be used to process someone's personal data. For example, "Legitimate Interest" can be used if there is a reasonable way that the usage could be foreseen like sending a "How did we do" email after somebody buys something. Unfortaunately, this is not well-defined in the regulations so, for example, one com…

At our company, we are actually required to timestamp and enumerate the legitimate interest on all new marketing leads. I think the issue is here that GDPR is a fairly poorly written cudgel of a law, and regulators are really only using it to go after larger foreign tech companies. Smaller, local companies can get away with much more malfeasance because it would be such a pain to enforce.

> really only using it to go after larger foreign tech companies

The big notable cases are against large tech companies, but most of the fines and procedures involve local entities

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#17

Question: How do I prove to the authorities that a subscriber has given consent? I imagine that an attribute on my "users" table is not enough?

“Double Opt In” is the way to go. They sign up, then you send them an email and track when they hit the “I approve” link.

Watch out, if you get a HTTP GET request on the approve link, it could be the mail provider scanning for malware, not the user. You may need triple opt in :-)

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#18

I live in Canada and I find it ridiculous that email without consent is illegal, phone calls without consent is illegal, but sending physical mail is perfectly fine. It makes me sad the amount of trees that must be cut down, shipped to a factory, processed into paper (with some hash chemicals), shipped to the printer, printed then shipped to me. Only to be thrown into the recycling unopened to be shipped to the recyc…

This is just a clear indication that it should have some cost to send a message, otherwise people (mis)use it until the legislators need to stop it attention robbery.

Re: Email marketing regulations around the world

#19

I live in Canada and I find it ridiculous that email without consent is illegal, phone calls without consent is illegal, but sending physical mail is perfectly fine. It makes me sad the amount of trees that must be cut down, shipped to a factory, processed into paper (with some hash chemicals), shipped to the printer, printed then shipped to me. Only to be thrown into the recycling unopened to be shipped to the recyc…

This is just a clear indication that it should have some cost to send a message, otherwise people (mis)use it until the legislators need to stop it attention robbery.

Well there is some cost to send a message. These are being sent via Canada Post. The problem is that the cost isn't high enough.
Post reply on HN