Live data from Hacker News

Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

classictypewriter.com

11–20 of 42 posts

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#11

Unrelated to his typewriter, I'm currently reading Cormac McCarthy's Suttree , and I'm really enjoying it. I had previously only associated McCarthy with The Road and Blood Meridian , but I'm glad I gave some of his other work a shot.

When Suttree found me it was exactly the right time and it left me forever changed. Not a month goes by I don't think of it nearly a decade later. Definitely my personal favorite of his. Wish I was reading it again for the first time :)

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#12
I had this exact typewriter, in exactly that blue-green color as a kid and learned to type on it, before ever getting a computer. It had been knocked around a bit and probably needed service. Keys would stick, two strikers would stick to each other if you were using keys next to each other sometimes, etc. What is crazy is I haven't seen it or used it in *almost 40 years and I can still remember exactly how it feels to press the keys and specifically the sound it would make when a letter hit the paper.

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#13

Unrelated to his typewriter, I'm currently reading Cormac McCarthy's Suttree , and I'm really enjoying it. I had previously only associated McCarthy with The Road and Blood Meridian , but I'm glad I gave some of his other work a shot.

Cormac McCarthy has the dubious distinction in my library of producing the most beautiful English I've ever read in service of such unrelentingly dismal stories that I don't feel that I have the stomach to read them again. I admit this is a me problem, but still. I've only read The Road and Blood Meridian , though. Does Suttree follow the same pattern? [edit] Thank you for the answers!

Suttree is semi-autobiographical.

There is less violence and more drinking than his other novels.

It doesn’t really investigate morality in the ways most of his novels do.

It is the last of his early novels set in Appalachia.

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cormac McCarthy has the dubious distinction in my library of producing the most beautiful English I've ever read in service of such unrelentingly dismal stories that I don't feel that I have the stomach to read them again. I admit this is a me problem, but still. I've only read The Road and Blood Meridian , though. Does Suttree follow the same pattern? [edit] Thank you for the answers!

All the Pretty Horses isn’t all that bleak. More of a western Bildungsroman.

[deleted]

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#15
I will never replace my trusted ORGA Modell 9 [0] as my doomsday writing machine. This thing served in the office of a painter's business for 3 generations until the mid-90ies, is nearly 100 years old and is still working perfectly. Just imagine a desktop computer, or a laptop, serving 3 generations for more than 60 years.

[0] https://ireland.apollo.olxcdn.com/v1/files/h5jm4s38hndf3-PL/...

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#17
I too learned to type on a typewriter. The idea to take typing in high school was suggested by another hacker/geek friend. It turned out the be a very valuable skill. But the skill is the only thing that I took with me. I never laid hands on a typewriter after that class. Other than the retro, steampunk-like vibe, is there any practical reason to use a typewriter?

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#18
For many authors, the tools they used were not the result of obsessive comparisons and ranking, but what was available, that they could afford. And if they decided to replace them, the replacement was likely to have only slightly more research applied: it must be portable because the old heavy one hurts to move around, or it must be heavy because the dog keeps knocking the portable off the table.

We live in the time of the blessing and the curse of choice.

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#19

I too learned to type on a typewriter. The idea to take typing in high school was suggested by another hacker/geek friend. It turned out the be a very valuable skill. But the skill is the only thing that I took with me. I never laid hands on a typewriter after that class. Other than the retro, steampunk-like vibe, is there any practical reason to use a typewriter?

For various definitions of "practical", I remember a quote from Frederick Forsyth, to wit: "No one has ever hacked my typewriter, nor will they." I think he was using some manual thing as well, and possibly from back in the day when he was a correspondent working in Africa in the '60s. (his quote is maybe 10 years old)

I'm old enough to appreciate a device that does one thing and does it really well, has almost no dependencies (just paper and ribbons, and if it's a cloth ribbon, you can re-ink it even more cheaply), doesn't need electricity, built like a tank, and can be remarkably portable, and is the epitome of a distraction-free writing environment. Even the most ruggedized laptop probably can't take a bullet and keep on working.

Re: Cormac McCarthy's Olivetti Lettera 32

#20
I was toying with buying a typewriter and a scanner and then using said typewriter for all first drafts and scanning them into the computer with OCR software to save time having to type them up. However I ended up discovering that the Apple Pencil and handwriting recognition in Nebo Notes is insanely good so I use that instead. I still might end up trying out the typewriter/scanner method at some point in the future when I start writing more seriously.

People dismiss these things as hipsterism but there is definitely something to be said for using them. There was an interview with Neil Gaiman where he talks about being an editor and noticing that after computers became widespread that the average length of stories being submitted increased dramatically with no increase in quality, or worse, a decrease in quality. He subsequently took personal efforts to avoid falling into the same trap. I believe he now writes all his first drafts using fountain pens and paper. Something about the slower nature of typewriters and handwriting forces you to slow down and think more which I believe is particularly useful when you’re writing fiction.

Post reply on HN