Live data from Hacker News

How transportation technologies shaped empires

unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com

11–20 of 313 posts

Re: How transportation technologies shaped empires

#13

“England with its American colonies” as an example of overstretching this limit? Once again, when explaining a historic trend or event in terms of what happened in the US, we forget about the existence of the control case: Canada.

And even more so, re: distance, Australia.

Re: How transportation technologies shaped empires

#14

What about the sun never setting on the British Empire? Wouldn't that mean the British empire was larger than 1 month of travel from the capital?

Why, I’d wager that, with modern Victorian transportation, a man could travel all the way around the world in less than eighty days. Meet me on the steps of the Reform club! Phileas Fogg’s example Suggests that at the height of the ‘sun never sets’ era, nowhere should have been more than 40 days away from London. And with a significant chunk of that time stuck transiting the pacific, brings the majority of the world…

No, it suggests that there was an optimal path around the world in 80 days. The geography of many regions would have made them more remote than the optimal path.

Re: How transportation technologies shaped empires

#15

“England with its American colonies” as an example of overstretching this limit? Once again, when explaining a historic trend or event in terms of what happened in the US, we forget about the existence of the control case: Canada.

Or Spain and South America?

Re: How transportation technologies shaped empires

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why, I’d wager that, with modern Victorian transportation, a man could travel all the way around the world in less than eighty days. Meet me on the steps of the Reform club! Phileas Fogg’s example Suggests that at the height of the ‘sun never sets’ era, nowhere should have been more than 40 days away from London. And with a significant chunk of that time stuck transiting the pacific, brings the majority of the world…

No, it suggests that there was an optimal path around the world in 80 days. The geography of many regions would have made them more remote than the optimal path.

In seriousness, the article’s final thesis is literally that steamships and trains and telegraphs broke the ‘month’ rule by bringing essentially the whole world inside the one month range, which is what enabled a ‘sun never sets’ empire and then broke empires in general.

Around the World in 80 days is set almost exactly at that inflection point.

Re: How transportation technologies shaped empires

#17
post #3

The logic seems sound to me, with a few obvious caveats: * The number of samples is small. There aren't a lot of empires throughout history. * The definition of "empire" is somewhat subjective, because empire sizes exhibit a Zipf distribution, and the cutoff is arbitrary. * Surely there have been other factors at play besides time to travel from the capital. One implication is that empires that span the globe are muc…

But for future interplanetary colonization, the rule would become one light month. Not very far. But imagine any form of communication taking years to bounce back and forth. That could not be centrally governed. It might not just be travel time, but it probably does correlate.
Post reply on HN