Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 138 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?

#13
It would be great to have AI suggest tags/categories, ability to snooze and recall at set times, and see when the site was last accessed.

I think bookmarks fail because they are buried away and not front and centre, and they mix the concepts of “notes for future reference” and “regularly visited favourite sites”.

Re: Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?

#16
post #10

I don't know about anyone else, but "giant list of media to consume in the future" be they games, movies, books, or blog posts is antithetical to me actually eventually enjoying that media. The value of having a list of things that I thought might be interesting but not interesting enough to read immediately is basically zero.

For me it's more often quick searches about an idea for something I want to buy/make/research, maybe as part of a larger project.

Re: Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?

#18
post #6

They have, its called having 400 hibernated Tabs open :)

For people suffering from terminal tabbitis (I hit 7.5k), I can recommend the one-tab extension.

> I hit 7.5k

...how?! Why?!

I'm pretty sure my maximum was ~15 tabs.

Re: Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?

#20
IME: Link rot. When your URLs aren’t valid for more than a few weeks, there’s no reason to keep them; it’s easier to search (not that search is always reliable over time either).

Any reinvention would have to incorporate search and keep track of sufficient content from the page to do a search for its new location. Either that or link to 3rd party content storage (i.e. archive.org et.al.)

Post reply on HN