Live data from Hacker News

GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

ariadne.space

11–20 of 303 posts

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#11

[flagged]

I would guess because nano is meant to be a replacement for pico.

Much to my surprise, I recently found nano was symlinked to pico on macOS. It'd been niggling at me for a while, I'd just assumed I'd been given an older version of nano. Guess I was kind of right.

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#12
I've never learnt Vim or Emacs, have always used Nano when editing via the terminal. However I increasingly find myself firing up a VSCode remote session if I need to edit more than a single line.

Remote VSCode is kind of magic, I'm increasingly working in (local) VMs via it. I have one project that is probably never going to never going to support ARM, and I'm close to needing to upgrade my MacBook. I really want an M2, but this project would be hard to run locally on it. VSCode on a remove VM is probably going to be the answer.

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#16
post #14

All of the old editors are horrible. Nano, vi, emacs... sure they might be conveniently placed, but are a pain to learn. This one is a vast improvement https://micro-editor.github.io/

Wha?! Nothing matches the power of vi or emacs. Nothing.

If you don't want the power, or don't need the tool, fine. I get that.

But calling vi terrible, is like complaining that a sledgehammer is terrible, because you want to hang a picture, and that's all you have.

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#17

I used to be a nano user but now whenever I want to use a terminal text editor I will almost always use micro as it has built in support for most languages. https://micro-editor.github.io/

Also checkout Helix for those who want Vim with nice defaults (like LSP).

https://helix-editor.com

https://github.com/helix-editor/helix

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#19
post #5

There was a time (2006?) when I was getting into linux. I was a big microsofty, due to comfort mostly, and I was shamed into trying Linux. Like most people I went Ubuntu first, but wifi drivers at the time were lacking, and nvidia of yore was certainly not better than nvidia of now. Suffice it to say: I spent a lot of time in the terminal trying to fix things. Nano was my tool of choice because: honestly the initial…

> I feel like nano shipping as the default editor is a step-back. We have a less powerful tool because we want to attract newbies

Perhaps, but your experience sounds like a good blueprint for what new terminal users might want. Start with nano move to more powerful tools when you need them.

Re: GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)

#20
post #14

All of the old editors are horrible. Nano, vi, emacs... sure they might be conveniently placed, but are a pain to learn. This one is a vast improvement https://micro-editor.github.io/

How is Nano an "old editor"? It was released just a bit more than 20 years ago...
Post reply on HN