I use Warp daily as a fang dev, they have constantly improved the product. I'm a believer.
What does being a "fang dev" have to do with the quality of this terminal?
The Terminal for the 21st Century
11–20 of 47 posts
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#12Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#13That is unless you subscribe to the belief that Apple has an overwhelming tech dominance or are an Apple stan and any refuse to recognise any other platform.
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#141. FOSS.
2. Portable, multi-platform.
This "warp" is neither.
Also... replying to some of their homepage quips:
> Our GPT-3 powered AI search will convert natural language into executable shell commands.
I'll grant you that _is_ kind of futuristic, but I would really rather not install your keylogger on my system.
> Along the way, we built our own UI framework, our own Rust-based CRDT editor and our own graphics shaders.
Did you now? Well, that sounds problematic. I expect the use of well-vetted common (if not standard) libraries. Also, why does a terminal app need graphics shaders?
----------
Edit: Oh, it looks like I was even more suspicious last time this was announced here on HN:
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#15Fast, easy to use and remembers commands from previous sessions which has been incredibly useful a number of times
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#16This looks interesting. Is it MacOS only? And how does it behave with tools like tmux or ssh?
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#17Sorry, that’s actually a deal-breaker.
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#18I'm a daily kitty user. I tried WezTerm but it was way too slow to load NeoVim for me over ssh.
Would need to play with it for some time - main things I can't live without at the moment are `ssh` + multiplexing across a remote session, and speed. It looks like Warp also doesn't support fish _well_ (most comments say it supports bash/zsh well). I am not necessarily attached to fish, but it is nicer IMHO.
Although, it looks like you have to login???? which is an immediate deal-breaker.
Re: The Terminal for the 21st Century
#19It's the terminal with telemetry - so an instant no-go.