Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

code.mendhak.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 32 posts

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#11

Post by Jyaif »

pwdisswordfish9 wrote: post #9
fattybob wrote: post #2

I love f droid and wish there was some way that all those apps could get links for iOS too (an iOS index?) - given an option I go for f droid and any iOS equivalent available always

The reasons for the absence are pretty self-explanatory. iOS itself is proprietary. First, someone would need to initiate a project to create a free software clone of iOS, like ReactOS re Windows or even GNU re UNIX. That's a worthwhile project in and of itself.

> iOS itself is proprietary.

That's not a reason at all.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#12

Post by monetus »

F droid has better discovery than the play store for apps that avoid monetizing their basic features, e.g. a QRcode scanner. Some criticisms about the release model are valid IMO, with it using a different dynamic of trust than the play store. There is no good replacement for f droid.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#13

Post by lostgame »

rakoo wrote: post #3
fattybob wrote: post #2

I love f droid and wish there was some way that all those apps could get links for iOS too (an iOS index?) - given an option I go for f droid and any iOS equivalent available always

What's the f-droid equivalent on iOS ?

Cydia; but it requires a jailbroken iOS/iPadOS device.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#14

Post by pwdisswordfish9 »

Jyaif wrote: post #11
pwdisswordfish9 wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reasons for the absence are pretty self-explanatory. iOS itself is proprietary. First, someone would need to initiate a project to create a free software clone of iOS, like ReactOS re Windows or even GNU re UNIX. That's a worthwhile project in and of itself.

> iOS itself is proprietary. That's not a reason at all.

F-Droid is a free software catalogue.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#17

Post by vanous »

worldsavior wrote: post #10
woojoo666 wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to elaborate? Has there been any instances of malware?

They follow bad practices. For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other. Look at this site[1], showing some reasons why google play store is preferred. [1] https://wonderfall.dev/fdroid-issues/

>For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other.

Fully agree, have some experiences.

Friendly advice: treat Fdroid like any other development dependency and try to be in control rather than being dependent: run your own f-droid repo which people can add to their Fdroid app as a source.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#18

Post by worldsavior »

vanous wrote: post #17
worldsavior wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They follow bad practices. For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other. Look at this site[1], showing some reasons why google play store is preferred. [1] https://wonderfall.dev/fdroid-issues/

>For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other. Fully agree, have some experiences. Friendly advice: treat Fdroid like any other development dependency and try to be in control rather than being dependent: run your own f-droid repo which people can add to their Fdroid app as a source.

Agreed. Using GitHub is already a better option since it's eliminating another party (Fdroid).

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#19

Post by mfuzzey »

pwdisswordfish9 wrote: post #9
fattybob wrote: post #2

I love f droid and wish there was some way that all those apps could get links for iOS too (an iOS index?) - given an option I go for f droid and any iOS equivalent available always

The reasons for the absence are pretty self-explanatory. iOS itself is proprietary. First, someone would need to initiate a project to create a free software clone of iOS, like ReactOS re Windows or even GNU re UNIX. That's a worthwhile project in and of itself.

The OS itself being proprietary isn't a reason to not have sideloading or alternative stores.

Windows is proprietary too yet you've always been able to download a .EXE from arbitary web sites.

Re: Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer

#20

Post by pwdisswordfish9 »

mfuzzey wrote: post #19
pwdisswordfish9 wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reasons for the absence are pretty self-explanatory. iOS itself is proprietary. First, someone would need to initiate a project to create a free software clone of iOS, like ReactOS re Windows or even GNU re UNIX. That's a worthwhile project in and of itself.

The OS itself being proprietary isn't a reason to not have sideloading or alternative stores. Windows is proprietary too yet you've always been able to download a .EXE from arbitary web sites.

> isn't a reason to not have sideloading or alternative stores

Who argued otherwise? On the topic of F-Droid in particular not being available for iOS, there _is_ a reason behind it.

Post reply on HN