Live data from Hacker News

A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

github.com

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#11
> A surprisingly large fraction of applicants, even those with masters' degrees and PhDs in computer science, fail during interviews when asked to carry out basic programming tasks. For example, I've personally interviewed graduates who can't answer "Write a loop that counts from 1 to 10" or "What's the number after F in hexadecimal?

I wonder if this is true?

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#12

Why is "opinionated" considered so valuable these days? In this case, it's redundant (curated implies opinionated, I think), so it's there to say something loudly. What? Are people not being opinionated enough? Is this defensiveness (if someone doesn't like what you did, well, you've already said it's just your opinion, man)?

I don't think it claims to be particularly valuable, it's just highlighting that this is one person's viewpoint and is not intended to be the end-all be-all definitive take on the topic.

Partly it's a way to head off the inevitable aggressive commenters who will jump all over some detail and how it doesn't apply to some particular situation.

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#13

> A surprisingly large fraction of applicants, even those with masters' degrees and PhDs in computer science, fail during interviews when asked to carry out basic programming tasks. For example, I've personally interviewed graduates who can't answer "Write a loop that counts from 1 to 10" or "What's the number after F in hexadecimal? I wonder if this is true?

This is a quote in https://blog.codinghorror.com/why-cant-programmers-program/ if anyone's wondering.

What does the author win by lying about it?

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#15

Why is "opinionated" considered so valuable these days? In this case, it's redundant (curated implies opinionated, I think), so it's there to say something loudly. What? Are people not being opinionated enough? Is this defensiveness (if someone doesn't like what you did, well, you've already said it's just your opinion, man)?

It's just a fashionable term at the moment, and a pretty useful way to say "I'm not soliciting input on this so don't bother providing it."

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#16
post #13

> A surprisingly large fraction of applicants, even those with masters' degrees and PhDs in computer science, fail during interviews when asked to carry out basic programming tasks. For example, I've personally interviewed graduates who can't answer "Write a loop that counts from 1 to 10" or "What's the number after F in hexadecimal? I wonder if this is true?

This is a quote in https://blog.codinghorror.com/why-cant-programmers-program/ if anyone's wondering. What does the author win by lying about it?

It could just be a mistake, or no longer true, it doesn't have to be a lie.

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#18

Why is "opinionated" considered so valuable these days? In this case, it's redundant (curated implies opinionated, I think), so it's there to say something loudly. What? Are people not being opinionated enough? Is this defensiveness (if someone doesn't like what you did, well, you've already said it's just your opinion, man)?

When I see "opinionated", I am interested in the popularity of the project. A popular opinionated framework has found something that works well. But opinionated on its own can equally well be terrible. So I am quite sceptical when I see something advertised as opinionated.

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#19

Why is "opinionated" considered so valuable these days? In this case, it's redundant (curated implies opinionated, I think), so it's there to say something loudly. What? Are people not being opinionated enough? Is this defensiveness (if someone doesn't like what you did, well, you've already said it's just your opinion, man)?

Because most resources want to educate you to the point of making an informed decision. But that defeats the whole point of delegating.

Personally I get analysis paralysis pretty easily. I couldn’t even figure out what water filter to buy and lost five hours trying to find out.

Re: A curated and opinionated list of resources for Chief Technology Officers

#20

Wow what a great list! Things like this increasingly make me think we need to go back to having web directories, like Yahoo and dmoz. There is so much great content out there that having good curated lists is very high value.

With the awesome lists, digital gardens, Pinboard and personal websites coming back I wouldn't be surprised if 'the human curated web' is the next big thing

Curated lists are already here in the form of SubStack & Email Newsletters.
Post reply on HN