The "new-fangled" AI, as the article calls it, is often useful when the stakes are low, and you can accept mistakes in outcomes. Examples of such applications are: trying to determine which of your friends occur in a photo, which movies a subscriber may be interested in, or which action could lead to victory in a computer game. Getting a rough translation of a newspaper entry, as mentioned in the article, is also a g…
GOFAI was never more than a rules engine. If-then statements. Agree with you about probabilistic AI being useful in low-stakes situations, at least at first.
GOFAI "aged out" of the AI label and became: compilers, databases, search algorithms, planning algorithms, programming languages, theorem proving, a million things that are still commonly used in NLP/CV/robotics, comp arch, etc. Aka, most of what makes computers actually useful.
If something's over 30 years old and is still called AI, that's just shorthand for saying it's a failed idea that in the best case hasn't had its moment yet.
> If-then statements.
99.999% of the software I use is just if-then statements.
(Also, this is like saying that deep learning is Linear Algebra.)