11–20 of 127 posts
They'll all get away clean. Check out Sam's parents, and other attached people...
Crypto has a strong reputation as a haven for money laundering, drug sales... So if any of the Mexican/South American drug cartels lost a lot of money Sam and the other top management of those companies could end up dead.
Good job to us!
They'll all get away clean. Check out Sam's parents, and other attached people...
I actually think this blowback is going to hit Sam's parents, who are part of the liberal intelligentsia. Sam himself is unquestionably going to jail or exile.
There’s also the matter of the hacked funds last night, and the juicy theory that SBF used his back door to steal even more cash. You can’t make it up!
This has been some of the funniest few days in recent memory. Even my crypto true-believer HODL maximalist friends are questioning the entire ecosystem and its value. I think it’s funny that so many people have been hypnotized by get-rich-quick schemes and promises of a utopian monetary system while forgetting what the original —actual— value proposition of crypto was: Buying heroin. As a corollary to “not your keys…
That's totally unfair.
It was buying all kinds of drugs, and weapons, and child porn, and stolen credit cards, and hiring assassins.
The assassins invariably turned out to be working for the FBI, of course.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Crypto has a strong reputation as a haven for money laundering, drug sales... So if any of the Mexican/South American drug cartels lost a lot of money Sam and the other top management of those companies could end up dead.
Serious Q, but what incentive would they have in killing him? Would that get them their money back? Wouldn't they lose more than they could gain?
This individual stealing people's money sheds light on how regulations exist for a reason, especially when handling billions of USD. Doesn't really speak positively or poorly on cryptocurrency as a technology though.
It's tempting to say he did it or inside job, but things never are as obvious as they seem. Why not just quietly siphon off funds from a cold wallet to his personal wallet? Why use a malicious app at all? This leads me to believe it was not an inside job.
Then again, sometimes the kid standing in the kitchen with the chocolate on his face and his hands behind his back looking guilty actually did steal the cookies from the cookie jar...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually think this blowback is going to hit Sam's parents, who are part of the liberal intelligentsia. Sam himself is unquestionably going to jail or exile.
Sam is the 2nd largest campaign contributor this election season. He’ll probably get away with this.
It's tempting to say he did it or inside job, but things never are as obvious as they seem. Why not just quietly siphon off funds from a cold wallet to his personal wallet? Why use a malicious app at all? This leads me to believe it was not an inside job.