Live data from Hacker News

Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

chimehq.com

11–20 of 42 posts

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#11

Why does the title refer to this as a Go editor when the linked page is talking about having support for 23 different languages?

I did ponder whether to not mention Go in the title, but I had noticed that it's unclear what the devs mean by "support for 23 languages". Go is known to have been their main focus. In general, there is no documentation whatsoever, although the editor is interesting.

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what other features do you need in a text editor other than typing text and getting code completion?

A pricing scheme where I don't pay $29.99 for a minimalist editor that gets one year of updates.

It doesn't expire and it's a way to support the little guy while getting a great product. I don't see the issue here. Also, $30 is how many cups of coffee? 6-7?

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A pricing scheme where I don't pay $29.99 for a minimalist editor that gets one year of updates.

It doesn't expire and it's a way to support the little guy while getting a great product. I don't see the issue here. Also, $30 is how many cups of coffee? 6-7?

You Mac users and your coffee comparisons... there are free editors out there that would put Chime to shame. I'd rather use Coteditor if I want a MacOS-native editor, or BBedit if minimalism is paramount.

I'm also the sort of person who balks at Sublime licenses, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. Still though, there are many (even Mac-native) editors that put up stiff competition.

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#14
post #3

The lack of integrated terminal or method of running a go program makes me question what use this is to someone. Until either of those is implemented, this is a no-go for me. Not even mentioning that it costs money to use without adding any value over free editors.

For me, the lack of those features is itself a feature.

I don't have any interest in using the subpar terminals/"execute this thing" buttons included in many editors. I'd rather use a terminal that I actually like -- the one I use for everything else.

I also don't want any "magic" to happen under the hood to run a thing (looking at you, Java IDEs). I want anyone to be able to download the thing I'm working on and run it without being tied to a particular editor/IDE, and the best way to do that is to put your build/run stuff into something portable (shell script, Makefile, task file, whatever) instead of relying on a button in a GUI somewhere.

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#16
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what other features do you need in a text editor other than typing text and getting code completion?

A pricing scheme where I don't pay $29.99 for a minimalist editor that gets one year of updates.

there is value in independent craftmanship

you can still feed the big corps with your data if that's what you prefer

but the people working on vscode don't do it for free either ;)

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A pricing scheme where I don't pay $29.99 for a minimalist editor that gets one year of updates.

there is value in independent craftmanship you can still feed the big corps with your data if that's what you prefer but the people working on vscode don't do it for free either ;)

> you can still feed the big corps with your data if that's what you prefer

This is an app for MacOS, the desktop operating system that sends Apple telemetry after every time you open an app. The notion that Chime is more private than comparable open-source editors is an outright lie, I welcome you to prove me wrong.

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#19
post #3

The lack of integrated terminal or method of running a go program makes me question what use this is to someone. Until either of those is implemented, this is a no-go for me. Not even mentioning that it costs money to use without adding any value over free editors.

> The lack of integrated terminal or method of running a go program makes me question what use this is to someone.

I'm quite happy with my current editor and probably wouldn't use this, but I have also never used either of those features. I run my code using a separate terminal in a separate window, and can't really understand why anyone likes squashing their terminal into the same space as their code (although I recognise that they do, and I'm glad that they can if that's what they want) - seems like it would be distracting and reduce the amount of code you can get on screen at once.

Re: Chime 2.0 – a Go Editor for macOS

#20
post #3

The lack of integrated terminal or method of running a go program makes me question what use this is to someone. Until either of those is implemented, this is a no-go for me. Not even mentioning that it costs money to use without adding any value over free editors.

I like having my terminal attached to my editor, but I don't like it integrated with the editor. Some of the integration features are cool, like clicking to view a file in the editor straight from an error message, but I always get frustrated with the integrated terminal's small size, and it's not convenient to resize it. Or it can slow down the editor when a lot of output is happening (VS Code). Sometimes it's a third-party solution that isn't well maintained (Atom, Sublime Text).

Ideally, I'd love a way to glue sets of windows together and move them around as one piece, without being a tiling window manager.

Post reply on HN