"US MP3 Player Retail Sales, by Brand, February 2007 (% market share)
Apple (73.7%), San Disk (9%), Creative (3.3%), Microsoft (2.3%), Samsung (2.2%), Other (9.5%)"
11–19 of 19 posts
"US MP3 Player Retail Sales, by Brand, February 2007 (% market share)
Apple (73.7%), San Disk (9%), Creative (3.3%), Microsoft (2.3%), Samsung (2.2%), Other (9.5%)"
Anytime I see this kinds of numbers, the first thing I think about is - What about inflation? Sadly, without proper information about what these numbers represent, and without accounting for inflation, there is no easy way to compare them.
Anytime I see this kinds of numbers, the first thing I think about is - What about inflation? Sadly, without proper information about what these numbers represent, and without accounting for inflation, there is no easy way to compare them.
The clear implication being that there is really no loss from piracy. While this point could be argued, these numbers show nothing. First off, we don't know how much money would have been made had there been no piracy - that is, the music industry might have made even more money every year. The other issue is that while the music industry's worldwide revenues have increased, recorded music revenues have actually decr…
So losses from people sharing music are important if they affect the ability, and desire of content producers.
Anytime I see this kinds of numbers, the first thing I think about is - What about inflation? Sadly, without proper information about what these numbers represent, and without accounting for inflation, there is no easy way to compare them.
Over this period, how big is inflation relative to noise?
If you think about it, apple takes HALF of the price of a download, so that's 18 BILLION downloads last year alone.
Anytime I see this kinds of numbers, the first thing I think about is - What about inflation? Sadly, without proper information about what these numbers represent, and without accounting for inflation, there is no easy way to compare them.
I am sad to see you downvoted because you are right. Wikipedia says 1.4% for 2010 in the USA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inflation_... I'd call quite significant and an important factor if you compare money over time.
The clear implication being that there is really no loss from piracy. While this point could be argued, these numbers show nothing. First off, we don't know how much money would have been made had there been no piracy - that is, the music industry might have made even more money every year. The other issue is that while the music industry's worldwide revenues have increased, recorded music revenues have actually decr…
Copyright exists to satisfy (is justified by) consumers greed for content. So losses from people sharing music are important if they affect the ability, and desire of content producers.
Anytime I see this kinds of numbers, the first thing I think about is - What about inflation? Sadly, without proper information about what these numbers represent, and without accounting for inflation, there is no easy way to compare them.
In the area of music, digital technology introduces a lot of deflation in the costs of both production and distribution. Over this period, how big is inflation relative to noise?