Earlier quoted context omitted.
Latour's work is broad and covers various disciplines: anthropology, sociology, philosophy... His books tend to be either broad and hard to read (An Inquiry on Modes of Existence) or easy but narrow (Pandora's Hope). Albena Yaneva's book is easy to read and broad. It covers Latour's work at large in simple terms, and not just for architects, in a way that Latour himself never took the time to write. Source: I worked…
While I am at it, let me paste below a Twitter thread I wrote about Latour when he passed. It may help understand his work from the angle of the HN culture. --- Bruno Latour has passed. We lost a true Wizard, larger than I can write. I had the pleasure to work with him at the Sciences Po médialab for a few years. I came as an engineer and left as an aspiring researcher. Here is what Latour's work has to offer to engi…
For those who are interested in learning a bit more about his work, the NyT profiled him some years ago[1]. It was interesting because he had been assailed by the scientific community for undermining some of their assertions about scientific fact as some kind of a tangible truth to be held, but he seemed to have had a late-career change of heart.
1- https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-pos... (https://archive.ph/ULKzn)